Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

On the Shoulders of Giants Through the Lens of the Laparoscope Dr. Harry Reich: Empathy, Optics and Courage.

Surgical technology international·2024

Same author

The Gynecologic Resectoscope: An Endangered Species.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2023

Same author

Resectoscopic Surgery Part III: Advanced Resectoscopic Surgery.

Surgical technology international·2022

Same author

Resectoscopic Surgery Part II: Introducing Ultrasound Guidance for Intermediate-Level Surgical Procedures.

Surgical technology international·2021

Same author

Resectoscopic Surgery Part I: Overcoming Obstacles and Mastering the Basics.

Surgical technology international·2021

Same author

Office-Based Gynecologic Surgery (OBGS): Past, Present, and Future: Part II.

Surgical technology international·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer

Published on: April 17, 2012

Instituting an office-based surgery program in the gynecologist's office.

Morris Wortman¹

¹Center for Menstrual Disorders and Reproductive Choice, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York 14618, USA. moe2020@cmdrc.com

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

|October 20, 2010

Summary

Office-based surgery (OBS) offers significant benefits for patients and healthcare systems. Careful planning ensures safety and comfort, with evolving guidelines supporting its practice.

More Related Videos

Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures (IRCP): A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation

Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures (IRCP): A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation

Published on: January 17, 2019

Surgical Techniques to Optimize Ovarian Reserve during Laparoscopic Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma

Surgical Techniques to Optimize Ovarian Reserve during Laparoscopic Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma

Published on: January 22, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer

Published on: April 17, 2012

Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures (IRCP): A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation

Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures (IRCP): A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation

Published on: January 17, 2019

Surgical Techniques to Optimize Ovarian Reserve during Laparoscopic Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma

Surgical Techniques to Optimize Ovarian Reserve during Laparoscopic Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma

Published on: January 22, 2022

Area of Science:

Surgical Innovation
Healthcare Management
Patient Safety

Background:

Office-based surgery (OBS) presents numerous advantages for patients, physicians, surgical teams, and healthcare systems.
Advancements in technology enable a wider range of procedures suitable for the office setting, enhancing patient care.
Careful preparation is crucial for maintaining patient safety and comfort during office-based procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

To review the advantages and considerations for implementing office-based surgery (OBS).
To highlight the current regulatory landscape and guidelines for OBS practices in the United States.
To emphasize the importance of accreditation, training, and mentorship in OBS.

Main Methods:

Review of current regulatory requirements for OBS across different states.
Analysis of guidelines provided by professional organizations such as the Federation of State Medical Boards, ACOG, AMA, and ASA.
Examination of factors critical for establishing a safe and effective OBS program.

Main Results:

Regulatory requirements for OBS vary significantly, with many states lacking specific guidelines.
Professional organizations offer recommendations for instituting OBS practices and ensuring patient safety and comfort.
Formal accreditation is recommended for practices performing invasive procedures with more than minimal sedation.

Conclusions:

Office-based surgery (OBS) is a viable and advantageous option when implemented with careful planning and adherence to safety standards.
Collaboration between residency programs and professional societies is essential for training and mentoring future physicians in OBS.
Accreditation and adherence to established guidelines are key to assuring quality of care in office-based surgical settings.