Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

05:54
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Third attempt to place implants in sites where previous surgeries have failed
Eli E Machtei1, Jacob Horwitz, Dani Mahler
1Department of Periodontology, School of Graduate Dentistry, Rambam Health Care Campus, Faculty of Medicine, Technion' IIT, Haifa, Israel. machtei@tx.technion.ac.il
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
|October 21, 2010
Summary
A third dental implant attempt in previously failed sites has a significantly lower survival rate (60%) compared to initial placements. This procedure is rare but may be necessary when other options are limited.
Area of Science:
- Dental implantology
- Oral surgery
- Reconstructive dentistry
Background:
- Re-implantation in previously failed dental sites shows lower survival rates.
- A third implant attempt at a site with two prior failures is uncommon but sometimes necessary.
- This study investigates the survival of implants placed for a third time in the same location.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the survival rate of dental implants placed for the third time in the same anatomical site.
- To compare the outcomes of third-attempt implants with those of previous attempts in the same patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective evaluation of 15 third-attempt implants in 12 patients with two previous implant failures at the site.
- Documentation of patient medical history, smoking status, implant dimensions, and survival.
- Consistent use of the same implant type and surgeon across all three attempts for each patient.
Main Results:
- Six of the 15 third-attempt implants failed, resulting in a 60.0% survival rate.
- Implant dimensions (length and diameter) did not significantly differ between the first, second, and third attempts.
- The mean follow-up period for surviving implants was 44.1 months.
Conclusions:
- Third-attempt dental implants in previously failed sites exhibit significantly lower survival rates.
- These findings highlight the reduced success probability of multiple implantations in compromised locations.
- The study underscores the importance of considering alternative treatments when feasible.
