Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
The implementation of diagnostic reference levels to Australian radiology practice
1Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), Yallambie, Victoria, Australia. anthony.wallace@arpansa.gov.au
National surveillance is lacking for rising radiation doses from diagnostic imaging, particularly multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). This poses a public health risk, necessitating the establishment of national diagnostic reference levels to optimize patient safety and reduce population exposure.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Radiation Protection
- Public Health
Background:
- There is no current national surveillance for increasing population radiation doses from diagnostic imaging procedures.
- Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) significantly contributes to this dose, with scans increasing by approximately 9% annually.
- The potential carcinogenic risk from current MDCT scanning necessitates a public health response.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the lack of national surveillance for diagnostic imaging radiation doses.
- To establish national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for ionising radiation in diagnostic imaging.
- To consult with professional organisations to ensure effective implementation of DRLs.
Main Methods:
- Estimating population dose from diagnostic imaging procedures, focusing on MDCT growth.
- Utilizing Medicare Benefits Schedule data to track MDCT scan increases.
- Implementing the International Commission on Radiological Protection's principles of Justification and Optimisation.
Main Results:
- MDCT scans are increasing by approximately 9% annually, with over 2 million performed in 2009.
- The effective dose from MDCT is approaching 1.2 mSv per annum.
- Current scanning patterns present a significant carcinogenic risk if dose-detriment models are accurate.
Conclusions:
- The increasing population dose from diagnostic imaging, especially MDCT, is a significant public health concern.
- Establishing national diagnostic reference levels is crucial for patient protection and reducing population burden.
- Collaboration with professional bodies is essential for the successful implementation of DRLs.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

