Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Generation of Straight or Branched Actin Filaments01:14

Generation of Straight or Branched Actin Filaments

The straight or branched structure formation of actin filaments is controlled by nucleating proteins such as the formins and Arp2/3 complex. Formin-mediated assembly results in straight filaments, whereas Arp2/3 protein complex-mediated assembly results in branched actin filaments.
Arp2/3 Complex
Arp2/3 complex is a seven-subunit complex consisting of two proteins similar to actin- Arp2 and Arp3, and five other subunits that help keep Arp2 and Arp3 inactive. When required, the complex is...
Actin Polymerization01:42

Actin Polymerization

Actin polymerization occurs through the head-to-tail association of binding sites on monomeric actin or G-actin to form filamentous or F-actin. The polymerization can be divided into three phases ̶  nucleation, elongation, and steady-state phase.
The nucleation phase involves forming a stable nucleus consisting of three actin monomers to form a new actin filament. Actin-binding proteins such as formins and Arp2/3 complex help filament growth post-nucleation. The Formins form straight actin...
Mechanism of Lamellipodia Formation01:31

Mechanism of Lamellipodia Formation

Cells migrating in response to external stimuli form lamellipodia, which are thin membrane protrusions supported by a mesh of linked, branched, or unbranched actin filaments. These actin filaments interact with myosin motor proteins, creating the dynamic actomyosin complex within the cytoskeleton. Contractility, or the ability to generate contractile stress, is inherent to the actomyosin complex. It helps cells detect the stiffness of the surrounding ECM and exert contractile force for...
MAPK Signaling Cascades01:07

MAPK Signaling Cascades

Mitogen-activated protein kinase, or MAPK pathway, activates three sequential kinases to regulate cellular responses such as proliferation, differentiation, survival, and apoptosis. The canonical MAPK pathway starts with a mitogen or growth factor binding to an RTK. The activated RTKs stimulate Ras, which recruits Raf or MAP3 Kinase (MAPKKK), the first kinase of the MAPK signaling cascade. Raf further phosphorylates and activates MEK or MAP2 Kinases (MAPKK), which in turn phosphorylates MAP...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Physical Confinement Modulates the Rate-Limiting Transition in the Release of Phosphate from Actin Filaments.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Guidelines for Successful Actin Polymerization Experiments.

Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Addendum: CYTOPLASMIC FILAMENTS OF AMOEBA PROTEUS: I. The Role of Filaments in Consistency Changes and Movement.

The Journal of cell biology·2026
Same author

Reaching the full potential of cryo-EM reconstructions with molecular dynamics simulations at 310 K: Actin filaments as an example.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

The curious case of anti-PEG antibodies.

Nanoscale·2025
Same author

Reaching the full potential of cryo-EM reconstructions with molecular dynamics simulations at 310 K: Actin filaments as an example.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation
15:05

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Published on: May 20, 2020

Molecular dynamics simulations of Arp2/3 complex activation.

Paul Dalhaimer1, Thomas D Pollard

  • 1Departments of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Biophysical Journal
|October 21, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study used molecular dynamics simulations to explore how the Arp2/3 complex changes shape during activation. The complex is known to form branched actin networks, but the exact mechanism of its structural shift was unclear. Researchers modeled the movement of Arp2 from its inactive to active position. They found that a 30° rotation around an α-helix in ARPC4 allows Arp2 to align with Arp3. This change increases surface area burial and stabilizes the complex. However, collisions between Arp2 and Arp3 subdomains may slow the process. The results suggest a mechanical basis for the conformational change in the Arp2/3 complex.

Keywords:
actin nucleationcytoskeletal dynamicsmolecular modelingstructural biology

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation
15:05

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Published on: May 20, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Molecular biophysics of actin regulation
  • Structural dynamics of cytoskeletal complexes
  • Computational modeling in cell biology

Background:

The Arp2/3 complex plays a role in forming branched actin networks during processes like endocytosis. Previous studies have shown the complex anchors new filaments to existing ones. Crystal structures reveal the inactive state of the complex. However, the transition from inactive to active remains unclear. Electron tomography has identified the active position of Arp2. The mechanism of this large-scale movement is not fully understood. This gap motivated the use of simulations to explore the conformational change. No prior work had resolved the detailed motion of Arp2 during activation. Understanding this change could clarify how the complex functions in vivo.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aimed to explore the structural transition of the Arp2/3 complex during activation. The goal was to model the movement of Arp2 from its inactive to active position. Researchers used molecular dynamics simulations to test this transition. They started with the inactive crystal structure as a basis. Forces were applied to Arp2 while Arp3 was restrained. The focus was on identifying the pivot point of the conformational change. The study sought to determine how the complex achieves its active state. This approach allowed for an atomistic-scale analysis of the structural shift.

Main Methods:

The research team used atomistic-scale molecular dynamics simulations to model the Arp2/3 complex. They began with the inactive crystal structure of the complex as the starting point. Simulations applied forces to Arp2 to move it toward its active position. Arp3 was held in place to observe the resulting structural changes. The movement was analyzed to identify rotational components of the complex. A 30° counterclockwise rotation was observed around an α-helix in ARPC4. The pivot point was localized to Glu⁸¹-Asn¹⁰⁰ in this helix. The simulations tracked how subunits realigned during the transition.

Main Results:

The simulations revealed a 30° counterclockwise rotation of a structural block containing Arp2 and ARPC1. This rotation occurred around an α-helix in ARPC4 (Glu⁸¹-Asn¹⁰⁰). Arp2 moved to align next to Arp3 in a second structural block. The active conformation buried more surface area than the inactive state. The complex remained stable throughout the simulations. In most cases, subdomain 2 of Arp2 collided with Arp3 during the movement. These collisions slowed the transition to the active state. The results suggest a mechanical barrier to full activation.

Conclusions:

The simulations showed a large-scale rotation of the Arp2/3 complex during activation. The pivot point for this movement was identified in an α-helix of ARPC4. Arp2 moved to align with Arp3 in the active conformation. The active state involved greater surface area burial than the inactive form. The complex remained stable during the transition. Subdomain collisions between Arp2 and Arp3 were observed in most simulations. These collisions may slow the activation process. The findings suggest a mechanical basis for the conformational change.

A 30° counterclockwise rotation of a structural block containing Arp2 and ARPC1 around an α-helix in ARPC4.

An α-helix in ARPC4 spanning Glu⁸¹ to Asn¹⁰⁰ serves as the pivot point.

To observe how Arp2 moves toward its active position without altering Arp3's position.

Collisions between Arp2 and Arp3 subdomains may impede the movement of Arp2 during activation.

The active conformation buries more surface area than the inactive state.

The complex remains stable throughout the simulations, suggesting a well-defined transition pathway.