Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Overdose reversal through peer intervention: Findings from the naloxone prospective outcome research study (NalPORS) on the effectiveness of overdose response by people who use opioids in the United Kingdom and Sweden.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2026
Same author

Trends in the incidence of low-grade intraventricular haemorrhage among preterm babies: a national cohort study.

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2026
Same author

Olanzapine for young people with anorexia nervosa: a synopsis of the main results from the OPEN open-label feasibility study.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same author

Changes of laboratory parameters during olanzapine treatment in young people with anorexia nervosa: exploratory results from the OPEN study.

The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry·2026
Same author

The proportion of people with primary affective disorders presenting to early intervention services: systematic review and meta-analysis.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2026
Same author

What is the evidence for social media addiction?

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Cluster size variability and imbalance in cluster randomized controlled trials.

Ben Carter1

  • 1Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K. b.r.carter@bham.ac.uk

Statistics in Medicine
|October 22, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Cluster randomized controlled trials require transparent reporting. Improved metrics accounting for cluster size variability are needed to ensure robust evidence and minimize imbalance in recruitment rates.

More Related Videos

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Cluster randomized controlled trials (CRCTs) are widely used for medical intervention evaluation.
  • Variability in cluster size significantly reduces the effective sample size in CRCTs.
  • Current reporting standards for CRCTs lack sufficient transparency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the impact of cluster size variability on effective sample size and evidence robustness.
  • To advocate for improved recruitment rate metrics beyond simple patient counts.
  • To demonstrate methods for minimizing imbalance in cluster randomized trials.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from four trials to illustrate the relationship between cluster size variability and imbalance.
  • Simulation studies to evaluate randomization strategies for minimizing imbalance.
  • Comparison of recruitment rate metrics, recommending alternatives to patient counts.

Main Results:

  • Cluster size variability demonstrably reduces effective sample size.
  • A two-block randomization strategy, weighted by cluster size for recruitment, can minimize chance imbalance.
  • Existing recruitment metrics are insufficient for accurately reflecting trial power and variability.

Conclusions:

  • Enhanced transparency in reporting CRCTs is crucial for robust evidence generation.
  • Adoption of metrics that account for cluster variability is recommended.
  • Specific randomization techniques can mitigate recruitment imbalance in CRCTs.