Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026
07:57
Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
Published on: April 29, 2014
Reliability of the Maestro radiographic measuring tool
Paul-André Deleu1, Hons Pod, Thibaut Leemrijse
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Luc University Hospital, UCL, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, B1200 Brussels, Belgium. pa.deleu@gmail.com
Foot & Ankle International
|October 23, 2010
Summary
The Maestro forefoot measurement and classification technique is reliable and precise when used with Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) digital radiographs. This validated method enhances forefoot assessment and patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Radiology
- Medical imaging analysis
Background:
- Maestro et al. developed a preoperative forefoot measurement and classification technique.
- The reliability and precision of this technique using PACS were previously undetermined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability and precision of the Maestro forefoot measurement and classification technique.
- To assess the feasibility of using the Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) for this technique.
Main Methods:
- Radiographic study of 73 subjects (36 female, 37 male).
- Two observers measured geometrical progression of lesser metatarsals using Maestro's methodology.
- Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% lower confidence limit (95% LCL) were calculated.
- Inter-observer agreement for forefoot classification was analyzed.
Main Results:
- The Maestro radiographic measuring technique demonstrated reliability for analyzing lesser metatarsal mathematical progression via PACS.
- A high concordance of 92.6% was observed between the two observers in classifying radiological forefoot morphotypes.
Conclusions:
- Maestro's forefoot measurement and classification system is precise and reproducible with PACS digital radiographs.
- This validated technique is expected to improve forefoot surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Related Concept Videos
02:46Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
01:52Accuracy and Precision
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate measurements...
01:18Errors in Taping
Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...
03:37Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.