Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Non-Verbal Cues

Non-Verbal Cues

Non-verbal communication extends beyond gestures and facial expressions to include vocal elements known as paralanguage. Paralanguage consists of non-verbal vocal cues such as pitch, loudness, speech rate, pauses, and non-verbal vocalizations like laughter, sighs, and moans. These elements not only accompany speech but also provide critical emotional and contextual information.The Role of Paralanguage in CommunicationParalanguage adds depth to spoken language by conveying emotions and...

Prosopagnosia

Prosopagnosia

Prosopagnosia, also known as face blindness, is the inability to recognize faces. In severe cases, individuals with prosopagnosia may not recognize close family members, including parents and spouses, by their faces. For instance, someone with prosopagnosia might walk past their child in a crowd, only realizing their mistake upon noticing their child's distinctive backpack or favorite jacket. Prosopagnosia specifically impairs facial recognition, while the recognition of other objects or...

Visual Agnosia

Visual Agnosia

Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round end"...

Learning Disabilities

Learning Disabilities

Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Revisiting the auditory hemodynamic response function in the era of fast fMRI.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Transfer of statistical learning from speech perception to production generalizes to reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same author

Speech motor control is not sequestered from general auditory processes.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026

Same author

Exposure to an accent transfers to speech production in a single shot.

Cognition·2025

Same author

Accented speech modulates multiple event-related potential components across multiple levels of language processing.

Communications psychology·2025

Same author

Coping Information Affects Older and Young Adults' Security Update Decisions.

Psychological reports·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Published on: August 9, 2024

Learning to use an artificial visual cue in speech identification.

Joseph D W Stephens¹, Lori L Holt

¹Department of Psychology and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. jdstephe@ncat.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

|October 26, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

People can learn new visual cues for speech sounds. These learned cues affect auditory speech perception, though less than natural facial cues, opening doors for hearing loss research.

More Related Videos

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Published on: August 9, 2024

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Neuroscience
Audiology

Background:

Auditory speech perception is significantly influenced by visual cues from a speaker's face.
The role of experience and the integration of novel visual information in speech perception remain underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the learnability of novel visual cues for phonetic categories.
To determine how these learned visual cues influence auditory speech perception.
To compare the impact of novel visual cues with natural facial cues in speech perception.

Main Methods:

Participants underwent training with artificial visual cues linked to specific phonetic categories.
Performance was assessed on identifying phonetic categories using these novel visual cues.
The influence of learned visual cues on auditory speech identification was measured.

Main Results:

Participants successfully learned to identify phonetic categories using the novel visual cues.
These newly acquired visual cues modulated auditory speech perception.
The influence of learned visual cues was less pronounced than that of natural facial visual cues.

Conclusions:

Speech perception can incorporate newly learned visual information, demonstrating perceptual learning.
The findings suggest distinct processing mechanisms for learned versus innate visual speech cues.
This research has implications for understanding multimodal integration and developing assistive technologies for the hearing-impaired.