Related Experiment Videos
Perioperative use of antibiotics in intra-abdominal surgical infections
Apostolos G Kambaroudis1, Savvas Papadopoulos, Michelle Christodoulidou
1Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokratio Hospital, Hellas, Greece. kambarou@med.auth.gr
Background:
We created a questionnaire with the aim of evaluating surgeon compliance with the guidelines for antibiotic use in the perioperative period in intra-abdominal surgical infections. We discuss the problems emerging from non-adherence to these guidelines.
Methods:
In the questionnaire, we tried to correlate the type of intra-abdominal infection with: (1) Time of antibiotic administration commencement; (2) type of antibiotic(s) administered; (c) duration of antibiotic administration; and (4) modification of antibiotic type/duration of administration in the presence of factors increasing the risk of treatment failure. In order to collect and process the data more easily, the patients were divided into four groups-Group A: Community patients with intra-abdominal surgical infections and simple contamination of the peritoneal cavity according to the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) guidelines; Group B: Community patients with an intra-abdominal surgical infection evolving to secondary peritonitis per SIS guidelines; Group C: Community patients with an intra-abdominal surgical infection with a high risk of surgical site infection; and Group D: Patients with recent hospitalization or nosocomial or postoperative intra-abdominal infection.
Results:
The questionnaire was sent to the directors of 43 surgical clinics in northern Greece, and 27 answered (63%). In 81.5% of the clinics (median 22; range 15-24), depending on the type of infection, empirical antibiotic treatment commenced preoperatively. In Group A, on average, 29.6% of the clinics (median 8; range 5-16) administer antibiotics for as long as 24 h, and 11.1% (median 3; range 1-10) use antibiotics not recommended in the SIS guidelines (e.g., third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, ciprofloxacin, imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, or piperacillin/tazobactam). In Group B, 22.2% of clinics (median 6; range 2-15) administer antibiotics for three to five days, and 14.8% (median 4; range 1-11) use antibiotics outside SIS guidelines. In Group C, 40.7% of clinics (median 11; range 1-14) administer antibiotics for more than five days, and 14.8% (median 4; range 1-14) use antibiotics that are outside the SIS guidelines. In Group D, 11.1% of clinics (median 3; range 2-5) do not cover Enterococcus with the antibiotics administered.
Conclusions:
There seems to be confusion in determining the situations with simple contamination of the peritoneal cavity, whose treatment requires short-duration antibiotic administration, and in the type of antibiotics administered to various patient groups, elements that lead to prolonged or erroneous administration of antibiotic drugs. Continuous discussion and surgeon training is imperative and may be the best choice to ensure familiarity with antibiotics and their proper use and thus to minimize serious adverse events and treatment failure.
Insights
Surgeon adherence to antibiotic guidelines for intra-abdominal infections is inconsistent, leading to prolonged or incorrect antibiotic use. Enhanced surgeon training is crucial for improving antibiotic stewardship and patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Infections
- Antibiotic Stewardship
- Clinical Compliance
Background:
- Evaluating surgeon adherence to perioperative antibiotic guidelines in intra-abdominal infections.
- Identifying challenges associated with non-compliance to established guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess surgeon compliance with antibiotic use guidelines in perioperative settings for intra-abdominal surgical infections.
- To identify specific areas of non-adherence and their potential impact on treatment outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A questionnaire was developed to evaluate antibiotic administration practices.
- Patients were categorized into four groups based on infection type and risk factors (Groups A-D).
- Data collected included timing, type, and duration of antibiotic administration, and modifications based on risk factors.
Main Results:
- 63% of surveyed clinics responded, with 81.5% initiating empirical antibiotic treatment preoperatively.
- Significant deviations from guidelines were observed, including inappropriate antibiotic duration and selection in all patient groups.
- Specific non-compliance noted in antibiotic duration for Group A (simple contamination) and Enterococcus coverage for Group D (nosocomial infections).
Conclusions:
- Confusion exists regarding appropriate antibiotic duration for simple peritoneal contamination and selection of antibiotics for different patient groups.
- Non-adherence leads to prolonged or erroneous antibiotic administration, increasing risks of adverse events and treatment failure.
- Continuous surgeon education and discussion are essential for improving antibiotic familiarity and proper use.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Microbiota Modulation by Antibiotics