Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
Published on: December 18, 2016
MR imaging of the brachial plexus: comparison between 1.5-T and 3-T MR imaging: preliminary experience
Alberto Tagliafico1, Giulia Succio, Carlo Emanuele Neumaier
1Department of Radiology, National Institute for Cancer Research, Genova, Italy. atagliafico@sirm.org
Objective:
To compare 1.5-T and 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the brachial plexus.
Materials And Methods:
Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained from 30 healthy volunteers and 30 consecutive patients with brachial plexus disturbances. MR was prospectively performed with comparable sequence parameters and coils with a 1.5-T and a 3-T system. Imaging protocols at both field strengths included T1-weighted turbo spin-echo (tSE) sequences and T2-weighed turbo spin-echo (tSE) sequences with fat saturation. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between muscle and nerve were calculated for both field strengths. The visibility of brachial plexus nerve at various anatomic levels (roots, interscalene area, costoclavicular space, and axillary level) was analyzed with a four-point grading scale by two radiologists. MR imaging diagnoses and pathological findings were also compared qualitatively.
Results:
SNR and CNRs were significantly higher on 3-T MR images than on 1.5-T MR images (Friedman test) for all sequences. Nerve visibility was significantly better on 3-T MR images than on 1.5-T MR images (paired sign test). Pathological findings (n = 30/30) were seen equally well with both field strengths. MR imaging diagnoses did not differ for the 1.5- and 3-T protocols.
Conclusions:
High-quality MR images of the brachial plexus can be obtained with 3-T MR imaging by using sequences similar to those used at 1.5-T MR imaging. In patients and healthy volunteers, the visibility of nerve trunks and cords at 3-T MR imaging appears to be superior to that at 1.5-T MR imaging.
Insights
Three-Tesla (3T) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offers superior brachial plexus nerve visibility compared to 1.5-T MR imaging. Both field strengths effectively detect pathological findings, with 3T providing enhanced signal and contrast ratios.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Neuroimaging
Background:
- Brachial plexus imaging is crucial for diagnosing neurological conditions.
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a key modality for visualizing the brachial plexus.
- Comparing different magnetic field strengths (1.5T vs. 3T) is essential for optimizing imaging protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic performance of 1.5-Tesla (T) and 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the brachial plexus.
- To evaluate image quality metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR).
- To assess the visibility of brachial plexus nerves at various anatomical locations.
Main Methods:
- Prospective MR imaging of 30 healthy volunteers and 30 patients with brachial plexus disturbances.
- Utilized comparable sequence parameters and coils on both 1.5-T and 3-T systems.
- Included T1- and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences with fat saturation; analyzed SNR, CNR, and nerve visibility using a grading scale.
Main Results:
- Significantly higher SNR and CNR were observed with 3-T MR imaging compared to 1.5-T MR imaging.
- Nerve visibility was significantly superior on 3-T MR images across all evaluated anatomical levels.
- Pathological findings were equally well visualized, and MR imaging diagnoses did not differ between the two field strengths.
Conclusions:
- High-quality brachial plexus MR images are achievable with 3-T systems using protocols similar to 1.5-T.
- 3-T MR imaging demonstrates superior visibility of brachial plexus nerve trunks and cords in both healthy individuals and patients.
- 3-T MR imaging represents an advancement for brachial plexus assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

