Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
Next-generation Sequencing03:00

Next-generation Sequencing

The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features.
Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

Overview
Base Excision Repair01:54

Base Excision Repair

One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A multifunctional chemotactic-antibacterial ChMA-AgNPs hydrogel for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>-infected wounds.

Biomaterials science·2026
Same author

Integrated Genomic and Epigenomic Analysis Reveals Epigenetic Plasticity in Disease Progression and Multidrug Resistance in Multiple Myeloma.

Cancer research·2026
Same author

Crystallinity-Engineered Schiff-Base Nickel Cathode Interlayers for Thermally Stable and High-Efficiency Organic Solar Cells.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2026
Same author

METTL3-IGF2BP3 as a glucose sensor in hyperglycemic microenvironment promotes tumorigenesis and glycolysis.

International journal of biological sciences·2026
Same author

Cleaving Fused-Ring Conjugated Structure and Introducing Aggregation-Induced Emission Effect Enable over 20% Efficiency Organic Solar Cells.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Pattern-Induced Directional Shear Force Synergized With Regulation of Multicomponent Fragments Entropy Effect for Printable Efficiency All-Polymer Solar Cells.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026
Same journal

GMSA: A Graph Matching and Point Cloud Registration-Based Method for Spatial Transcriptomics Data Alignment.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same journal

Investigations on Multiple Protein Scaffold Filling.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same journal

Cell Type Prediction for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Utilizing Unsupervised Domain Adaptation and Semi-Supervised Learning.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same journal

PPIGAN: Prediction of Protein-Protein Interactions Using Generative Adversarial Networks.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same journal

Deep Structure-Enhanced Cell Clustering Model for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same journal

Asymmetric Drug-Drug Interaction Prediction Based on Generative Adversarial Networks and Knowledge Graph.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

EDAR: an efficient error detection and removal algorithm for next generation sequencing data.

Xiaohong Zhao1, Lance E Palmer, Randall Bolanos

  • 1Siemens Corporate Research , Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

Journal of Computational Biology : a Journal of Computational Molecular Cell Biology
|October 27, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method to detect and remove sequencing errors in genomic data, improving accuracy for downstream analysis. The approach significantly reduces error rates, enhancing sequence assembly and diagnostic processes.

More Related Videos

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing
11:11

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing
06:58

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 27, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing
11:11

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing
06:58

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 27, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Genomic sequencing errors complicate DNA assembly and diagnostics.
  • Accurate genomic data is crucial for research and clinical applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a method for detecting and removing sequencing errors from genomic reads before assembly.
  • To improve the accuracy and reliability of genomic data analysis pipelines.

Main Methods:

  • K-mer frequency analysis and variable-bandwidth mean-shift clustering to identify error regions.
  • Heuristic algorithms for error localization and removal within reads.
  • Testing on diverse real and simulated genomic datasets (454 and Solexa).

Main Results:

  • The algorithm detected 99% of errors across 23 datasets.
  • Error rates were reduced by approximately 35-fold on average.
  • The method demonstrated comparable or superior accuracy to existing error correction techniques, especially for high error rates (>3%).

Conclusions:

  • The developed method effectively detects and removes sequencing errors, significantly improving data quality.
  • Error removal enhances the performance of sequence assemblers like Velvet.
  • While effective, error removal's splitting of reads may pose challenges for short-read data; error correction might be a preferable alternative in some cases.