Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a polypeptide...
Protein-Protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-Protein Interfaces

Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a polypeptide...
Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts01:57

Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts

Groups of proteins may form a complex where each protein in this complex has a different role in the overall execution of the complex’s function. Often some of the proteins in the complex can be replaced by a closely related variant to give a complex that contains many of the same components yet is functionally distinct.
The SCF ubiquitin ligase is a protein complex of five individual proteins. This complex attaches ubiquitin to other target proteins to mark them for degradation. In order to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing machine learning-based binder design with high-throughput screening: A comparison of mRNA and yeast display technologies.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2026
Same author

Deep learning based design of buried hydrogen bond networks with HBDesigner.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

De novo masking domains that gate TNF-family ligand assembly and activity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Intensity modulation of trichromatic split fluorescent proteins for live cell mapping.

Cell reports methods·2026
Same author

Enhancing Enzymatic Bioconjugation Efficiency via Computer-Based Installation of a Substrate Recruitment Domain.

Bioconjugate chemistry·2026
Same author

Enhancing ML-based binder design with high-throughput screening: a comparison of mRNA and yeast display technologies.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

Engineering a protein-protein interface using a computationally designed library.

Gurkan Guntas1, Carrie Purbeck, Brian Kuhlman

  • 1Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7260, USA.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|October 27, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Combining computational protein design with experimental screening accelerates the discovery of novel protein binders. Directed libraries, guided by simulations, significantly enriched for high-affinity binders to Ubc12, outperforming naive libraries.

More Related Videos

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors
10:33

Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors

Published on: October 26, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors
10:33

Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors

Published on: October 26, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Protein engineering
  • Computational biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Protein design algorithms face limitations in sampling conformational and sequence space.
  • Experimental screening of protein libraries offers broad sequence exploration but lacks computational guidance.
  • Integrating computational and experimental methods can overcome individual approach limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To combine computational protein design with experimental screening to create a variant of ubiquitin-ligase E6AP that binds the nonnatural partner Ubc12.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of naive, semidirected, and directed libraries in identifying high-affinity binders.
  • To determine if computational screening for well-folded sequences is sufficient for successful protein design.

Main Methods:

  • Construction of three E6AP mutant libraries: naive, semidirected (disallowing destabilizing mutations), and directed (using docking and sequence optimization).
  • Screening of libraries using a split-dihydrofolate reductase complementation assay.
  • Characterization of binding affinity (Kd) for selected binders.

Main Results:

  • Directed libraries showed >30-fold enrichment over the naive library after one screening round.
  • Multiple tight binders (Kd < 100 nM) were identified after four rounds of selection from directed libraries.
  • Naive libraries failed to yield binders with Kd < 50 μM even after four rounds of selection.

Conclusions:

  • Computational protein design simulations can generate directed libraries enriched in tight binders.
  • Combining computational design with experimental screening is an effective strategy for protein engineering.
  • In some cases, computationally screening for well-folded sequences is sufficient for successful protein design without explicit binding calculations.