Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026
Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
Published on: February 24, 2015
Global DNA methylation: comparison of enzymatic- and non-enzymatic-based methods
Monica S Rocha1, Rita Castro, Isabel Rivera
1Metabolism and Genetics Group (Met&Gen Group), Institute for Medicines and Pharmaceutical Sciences (iMed.UL), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Portugal. mesrocha@ff.ul.pt
Background:
The most frequently used methods for measuring global DNA methylation are based on two different principles: the use of methylation-sensitive restriction endonucleases followed by analysis of the obtained fragments, or the hydrolysis of genomic DNA followed by specific detection and quantification of the 5-methylcytosine content. We aimed to compare two different methods for evaluation of global DNA methylation: the cytosine extension assay after enzymatic digestion of DNA (Cyt-Ext), and a recently described method using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry after DNA hydrolysis (LC-MS/MS).
Methods:
Both approaches were applied to evaluate global DNA methylation in leukocyte DNA from 96 healthy subjects. Calf thymus and pBR322 DNAs were used as hyper- and hypo-methylated references, respectively.
Results:
Using the Cyt-Ext method, the DNA from healthy individuals showed radiolabel incorporation of 11,312±1600 Dpm/μg DNA, while the LC-MS/MS method showed 4.55±0.1% methylation. Results are shown as mean±SD. The analysis of hypo- and hyper-methylated references showed that both methods are practical for discriminating different levels of methylation.
Conclusions:
Cyt-Ext and LC-MS/MS are viable methods in evaluating global DNA methylation status. However, the LC-MS/MS assay allows absolute quantification and displays far superior intra-day precision. Therefore, we consider the later approach to be better for use in global DNA methylation studies.
