Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p ≠ 0.5.
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can be stated as...
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inference on the Eigenvalues of the Normalized Precision Matrix.

Linear algebra and its applications·2024
Same author

Spectral Bayesian network theory.

Linear algebra and its applications·2023
Same author

Three Innate Cytokine Biomarkers Predict Presence of Acute Otitis Media and Relevant Otopathogens.

Biomarkers and applications·2022
Same author

SIRT3 promotes auditory function in young adult FVB/nJ mice but is dispensable for hearing recovery after noise exposure.

PloS one·2020
Same author

Statistical projection of post-vaccination antibody kinetics between dosing schedules.

Vaccine·2019
Same author

Effectiveness of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccination for protection against acute otitis media caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae in healthy young children: a prospective observational study.

The Lancet. Child & adolescent health·2018
Same journal

Learning directed acyclic graphs from large-scale genomics data.

EURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology·2017
Same journal

Bayesian inference for biomarker discovery in proteomics: an analytic solution.

EURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology·2017
Same journal

Review of stochastic hybrid systems with applications in biological systems modeling and analysis.

EURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology·2017
Same journal

Using multi-step proposal distribution for improved MCMC convergence in Bayesian network structure learning.

EURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology·2017
Same journal

On biometric systems: electrocardiogram Gaussianity and data synthesis.

EURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology·2017
Same journal

Biomedical informatics with optimization and machine learning.

EURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology·2017
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

A hypothesis test for equality of bayesian network models.

Anthony Almudevar1

  • 1Department of Computational Biology, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.

EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology
|October 29, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel generalized likelihood ratio test for comparing gene expression network structures across different phenotypes. The method uses permutation testing and efficient algorithms for computational feasibility in gene-set analysis.

More Related Videos

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics
  • Statistical Genetics

Background:

  • Bayesian network models are widely used for gene expression data analysis.
  • Comparing network structures between different phenotypes is crucial but lacks robust statistical methods.
  • Existing methods struggle to assign statistical significance to observed differences in network structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a rigorous hypothesis test for the homogeneity of gene network structures.
  • To enable statistically significant comparisons of gene expression networks across varying phenotypes.
  • To provide a computationally feasible approach for gene-set analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a generalized likelihood ratio test for Bayesian network models.
  • Estimation of significance levels using permutation replications.
  • Adaptation of Chow and Liu's algorithm for polynomial-time calculation of maximum likelihood Bayesian networks with maximum indegree of one.
  • Application of sequential testing principles to reduce computation time in permutation tests.

Main Results:

  • A novel generalized likelihood ratio test for comparing gene network structures was developed.
  • Efficient algorithms were introduced to ensure computational feasibility.
  • The method was successfully applied to gene-set analysis using experimental data.
  • The pathway modeling approach demonstrated advantages for this type of analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The developed hypothesis test provides a statistically rigorous method for comparing gene network structures.
  • The computational enhancements make the method practical for complex biological data.
  • This approach offers advantages for pathway modeling and gene-set analysis in genomics.