Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response01:29

Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response

Geographic Information System (GIS) technology is essential for risk identification, action prioritization, and resource optimization in critical situations like flooding and earthquakes. By integrating spatial and demographic data, GIS provides a comprehensive framework for emergency response.GIS integrates data layers, like rainfall intensity, topography, elevation profiles, and river levels, to model high-risk flood zones. These layers assess areas susceptible to flooding based on their...
Manipulation and Analysis01:21

Manipulation and Analysis

GIS manipulation and analysis functions are vital for decision-making and planning. These activities range from data retrieval tasks, such as selecting information based on specific criteria, to advanced analytical techniques that address complex spatial problems.One critical GIS analysis method is overlaying, which combines multiple data layers to examine impacts. For example, overlaying a river-dammed lake boundary with road networks can identify affected infrastructure. Another common...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Benchmarking performance of annual burn probability modeling against subsequent wildfire activity in California.

Scientific reportsยท2026
Same author

Wildfires have created instability within risk transfer markets. Here's a path forward.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Americaยท2025
Same author

Optimizing woody fuel treatments to reduce wildfire risk to sagebrush ecosystems in the Great Basin of the western US.

Journal of environmental managementยท2025
Same author

Benchmarking performance of annual burn probability modeling against subsequent wildfire activity in California.

Scientific reportsยท2025
Same author

Protein-Like Polymers Targeting Keap1/Nrf2 as Therapeutics for Myocardial Infarction.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)ยท2025
Same author

An optimization model to prioritize fuel treatments within a landscape fuel break network.

PloS oneยท2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Advancing effects analysis for integrated, large-scale wildfire risk assessment.

Matthew P Thompson1, David E Calkin, Julie W Gilbertson-Day

  • 1Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Missoula, MT, USA. mpthompson02@fs.fed.us

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
|October 29, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a wildfire risk assessment tool to monitor wildfire trends and prioritize mitigation efforts. It integrates fire likelihood, intensity, and resource impacts for regional and national scales.

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Wildland fire science
  • Geospatial risk assessment
  • Ecological modeling

Background:

  • Wildfire risk assessment is crucial for prioritizing fuels treatments and mitigation.
  • Existing methods struggle to quantify fire's impact on ecological and nonmarket values.
  • Uncertainty in fire effects analysis presents a challenge for integrated risk assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To design and develop a quantitative, geospatial tool for monitoring wildfire risk trends.
  • To approximate how fire likelihood and intensity influence risks to social, economic, and ecological values.
  • To provide data for prioritizing fuels treatments and mitigation measures.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a tool integrating burn probability maps from wildfire simulations.
  • Incorporated spatially identified highly valued resources (HVRs).
  • Utilized expert systems and consultation with fire management officials to define quantitative resource response functions based on fire intensity.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated a proof-of-concept application of the wildland fire risk assessment tool.
  • The tool provides a first approximation of wildfire risk at regional and national scales.
  • Advanced wildfire effects analysis by managing knowledge uncertainty through an expert systems approach.

Conclusions:

  • The developed tool facilitates monitoring wildfire risk trends over time.
  • It offers valuable information for prioritizing fuels treatments and mitigation strategies.
  • This approach improves the integration of fire effects into risk assessments by addressing knowledge uncertainty.