Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
Effect of renal function on survival after implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement
Casey S Hager1, Sunil Jain, Jeffry Blackwell
1Scott & White Healthcare and Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Temple, USA. wvheartdoc@yahoo.com
Insights
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) improve survival in heart failure, but outcomes worsen with declining kidney function. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) significantly increases mortality risk after ICD implantation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are crucial for preventing sudden cardiac death in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
- Limited data exist on ICD outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage on 1-year mortality after ICD implantation for primary prevention.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 958 patients undergoing ICD placement for primary prevention (2000-2006).
- Patients stratified into 5 CKD stages based on glomerular filtration rate (GFR).
- Primary endpoint: 1-year all-cause mortality.
Main Results:
- Overall 1-year mortality was 7.6%.
- Mortality increased significantly with worsening CKD stage (1.8% in stage 1 to 38% in stage 5, p <0.0001).
- CKD was an independent predictor of mortality, with hazard ratios increasing substantially in later stages.
Conclusions:
- Patients with CKD and left ventricular dysfunction have a poor prognosis despite ICD implantation.
- Decreasing renal function is associated with increased 1-year mortality.
- Clinicians must consider CKD prognosis when deciding on ICD implantation.
Abstract:
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are effective at reducing arrhythmic death in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, but few studies have investigated the outcomes after ICD implantation in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We conducted a 2-center retrospective study of 958 patients who had undergone ICD placement for primary prevention from the 2000 to 2006. The patients were stratified into 5 groups according to the CKD stage (stage 1, glomerular filtration [GFR] 90 to 120 ml/min; stage 2, GFR 60 to 89 ml/min; stage 3, GFR 30 to 59 ml/min; stage 4, GFR 15 to 29 ml/min; and stage 5, GFR 0 to 14 ml/min). The primary end point was death at 1 year. Of the 958 patients included in our analysis, 73 (7.6%) had died at 1 year. The mortality rate at 1 year increased with worsening CKD (1.8%, 5.3%, 9.0%, 22%, and 38% for stage 1 to 5, respectively, p <0.0001 for group). CKD was an independent predictor of mortality; hazard ratio 1.0, 1.075 (95% confidence interval 0.578 to 2.0), 1.372 (95% confidence interval 0.736 to 2.556), 3.092 (95% confidence interval 1.52 to 6.29), and 10.15 (95% confidence interval 4.25 to 24.23) for stage 1 to 5, respectively (p <0.0001 for group). Patients with CKD and left ventricular dysfunction have a poor prognosis despite ICD placement. The 1-year mortality increased as the renal function decreased. In conclusion, physicians should be cognizant of the prognosis when considering whether an ICD should be implanted in patients with CKD.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Renal Failure: Dose Adjustments
Reduced renal clearance and elimination rate are common outcomes of renal impairment. These alterations lead to a prolonged elimination half-life and an altered apparent volume of distribution for drugs. As a result, dosage adjustments are typically necessary to maintain optimal drug levels in the body.
However, dosage adjustments...
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
