Search research articles

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Issues

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:

Ethical Dilemmas II

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...

Continuing Care

Continuing Care

Continuing care describes the variety of health, personal, and social services provided over a prolonged period. The need for continuing care is increasing because people are living longer. Many people do not have families or others to care for them. Continuing care is mainly for patients who are disabled, functionally dependent, or suffering from a terminal disease. It is available within institutional settings or in homes. Examples include nursing centers or facilities, assisted living,...

Nursing Ethical Principles II

Nursing Ethical Principles II

Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...

Standards of Care II

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Our Social Support Systems and Their Effects on Our Health.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026

Same author

Long-term use of tDCS-clinical and ethical considerations.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026

Same author

Dilemmas of nudging in public health: an ethical analysis of a Danish pamphlet.

Health promotion international·2020

Same author

Nudging in Public Health Lifestyle Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review and Metasynthesis.

Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education·2020

Same author

Selective patient and public involvement: The promise and perils of pharmaceutical intervention for autism.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2017

Same author

'Autism and the good life': a new approach to the study of well-being.

Journal of medical ethics·2016

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

A Standardized Pig to Macaque Heterotopic Heart Xenotransplantation Model

A Standardized Pig to Macaque Heterotopic Heart Xenotransplantation Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Life support and euthanasia, a perspective on Shaw's new perspective.

Jacob Busch¹, Raffaele Rodogno

¹Department of Philosophy, University of Aarhus, Denmark. filjab@hum.au.dk

Journal of Medical Ethics

|October 30, 2010

Summary

Shaw (2007) proposed that voluntary active and passive euthanasia are similar. This paper argues that Shaw

Area of Science:

Bioethics
Medical Ethics
Philosophy of Medicine

Background:

The distinction between voluntary active euthanasia and voluntary passive euthanasia is commonly accepted in medical ethics literature.
Shaw (2007) challenged this distinction by proposing a new perspective on end-of-life situations.
Shaw's argument suggests that life support can be viewed as 'unwarranted' for competent patients desiring death, thus collapsing the distinction.

Discussion:

This paper critically evaluates Shaw's (2007) perspective on euthanasia.
The authors contend that Shaw's viewpoint only makes the lack of distinction between active and passive euthanasia seem more plausible.
The core argument is that Shaw has not demonstrated the superiority of his perspective in accurately reflecting the moral complexities of end-of-life decisions.

More Related Videos

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Published on: August 30, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

A Standardized Pig to Macaque Heterotopic Heart Xenotransplantation Model

A Standardized Pig to Macaque Heterotopic Heart Xenotransplantation Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Published on: August 30, 2020

Key Insights:

Shaw's (2007) argument for the collapse of the distinction between voluntary active and passive euthanasia is critically examined.
The authors maintain that Shaw's perspective fails to provide a demonstrably superior framework for understanding end-of-life moral features.
The paper asserts that the distinction between active and passive euthanasia remains morally significant.

Outlook:

Further philosophical and ethical analysis is needed to fully address the nuances of end-of-life care and patient autonomy.
Future research should explore alternative ethical frameworks that better capture the moral distinctions in euthanasia debates.
The ethical implications of 'unwarranted' life support require deeper investigation.