Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model01:13

Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model

Drugs administered through various routes can lead to nonlinear elimination, resulting in complex pharmacokinetic behaviors crucial to understanding efficacious drug dosing.
When a drug is administered through a constant intravenous infusion and eliminated via nonlinear pharmacokinetics, it follows zero-order input. For example, oral drugs undergo first-order absorption upon administration and are eliminated through nonlinear pharmacokinetics.
In the case of subcutaneously administered drugs,...
Kinematic Equations - II01:17

Kinematic Equations - II

The second kinematic equation expresses the final position of an object in terms of its initial position, the distance traveled with the initial constant velocity, and the distance traveled due to a change in velocity. Similar to the first kinematic equation, this equation is also only valid when the acceleration is constant throughout the motion of an object.
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Kinematic Equations - III01:18

Kinematic Equations - III

The first two kinematic equations have time as a variable, but the third kinematic equation is independent of time. This equation expresses final velocity as a function of the acceleration and distance over which it acts. The fourth kinematic equation does not have an acceleration term and provides the final position of the object at time t in terms of the initial and final velocities. This equation is useful when the value of the constant acceleration is unknown.
Using the kinematic equations,...
Kinematic Equations - I01:26

Kinematic Equations - I

When an object moves with constant acceleration, the velocity of the object changes at a constant rate throughout the motion. The kinematic equations of motions are derived for such cases where the acceleration of the object is constant. The first kinematic equation gives an insight into the relationship between velocity, acceleration, and time. We can see, for example:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generative Consistency Models for Estimation of Kinetic Parametric Image Posteriors in Total-Body PET.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
Same author

Diffusion models for medical image reconstruction.

BJR artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

Rodent biodistribution and dosimetry of the PET radioligands [<sup>18</sup>F]CHDI-385 and [<sup>18</sup>F]CHDI-386 targeting mutant huntingtin aggregates.

Nuclear medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Preclinical evaluation of [<sup>11</sup>C]CHDI-009R for quantification of mutant huntingtin aggregates.

Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)·2025
Same author

Personalized MR-Informed Diffusion Models for 3D PET Image Reconstruction.

IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences·2025
Same author

In Vivo PET Imaging of [<sup>18</sup>F]CHDI-385, a Radioligand for Mutant Huntingtin Aggregates in a Mouse Model of Huntington Disease.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

AB-OSEM reconstruction for improved Patlak kinetic parameter estimation: a simulation study.

Jeroen Verhaeghe1, Andrew J Reader

  • 1Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. jeroen.verhaeghe@mcgill.ca

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|October 30, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Removing the non-negativity constraint in OSEM reconstruction, specifically with the AB-OSEM algorithm, reduces bias and improves accuracy in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging, especially for dynamic data. This method offers lower overall error compared to standard OSEM and FBP reconstructions.

More Related Videos

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
06:58

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study

Published on: November 6, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
06:58

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study

Published on: November 6, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Image Reconstruction

Background:

  • OSEM reconstruction introduces positive bias in cold regions, particularly with low-count data common in dynamic PET imaging.
  • The non-negativity constraint, while reducing standard deviation, can be detrimental to quantitative accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate algorithms that relax the non-negativity constraint in image reconstruction.
  • To compare the performance of AB-OSEM and NEG-ML algorithms against standard OSEM and FBP.
  • To evaluate reconstruction methods for static and dynamic PET imaging, including kinetic parameter estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated two non-negativity-constrained algorithms: NEG-ML and AB-OSEM.
  • Developed AB-OSEM to incorporate randoms and scatter background terms.
  • Conducted simulation studies comparing OSEM, FBP, and AB-OSEM for static and dynamic PET data.
  • Assessed reconstruction performance based on bias, standard deviation, and root mean squared error (RMSE).

Main Results:

  • AB-OSEM outperformed NEG-ML reconstruction.
  • AB-OSEM, with a negative lower bound, successfully avoided the positive bias seen in OSEM.
  • AB-OSEM demonstrated lower overall RMSE for activity concentration and kinetic parameters compared to OSEM and FBP.
  • Parametric images from high-resolution research tomograph were generated using different reconstruction methods.

Conclusions:

  • Lifting the non-negativity constraint using AB-OSEM improves quantitative accuracy in PET imaging.
  • AB-OSEM is a preferred reconstruction method over standard OSEM and FBP for kinetic parameter estimation from dynamic PET data.
  • The AB-OSEM algorithm offers a robust approach for reducing errors in both static and dynamic PET quantification.