Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

A Zebrafish Model of Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Memory
Published on: February 28, 2013
Intensive glycemic control and macrovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized
Hong Wu1, Mao-jin Xu, Da-jin Zou
1Department of Endocrinology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Background:
There is no agreement as to whether intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes can reduce the incidence of macrovascular events in these patients. We performed a meta-analysis comparing intensive glucose control or conventional glucose control in randomized controlled trials.
Methods:
Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane controlled trials register, the Cochrane Library, and Science Citation Index were searched to find relevant trials. Outcome measures were the incidence of major macrovascular events.
Results:
Six trials involving 28 065 patients were included. Analysis suggested that there was an obviously decreased incidence of major macrovascular events in patients having intensive glucose treatment vs. controls (RR 0.92; 95%CI 0.87, 0.98; P = 0.005). However, intensive glycemia control strategies in type 2 diabetes showed no significant impact on the incidence of death from any cause compared with conventional glycemia control strategies, intensive 14.7%, controls 12.0% (RR 0.95; 95%CI 0.80, 1.12; P = 0.55), as well as on the incidence of cardiovascular death, intensive 3.7%, controls 3.6% (RR 1.10, 95%CI 0.79, 1.53; P = 0.57).
Conclusions:
Control of glycemia to normal (or near normal levels) in type 2 diabetes appears to be effective in reducing the incidence of major macrovascular events, but there were no significant differences of either the mortality from any cause or from cardiovascular death between the two glycemia-control strategies.
Insights
Intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes significantly reduces major macrovascular events. However, this approach showed no impact on overall or cardiovascular mortality compared to conventional control.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Cardiology
- Metabolic Diseases
Background:
- Disagreement exists on intensive glucose control's effect on macrovascular events in type 2 diabetes.
- Meta-analysis needed to compare intensive vs. conventional glucose control in randomized trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of major macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes under intensive glucose control versus conventional glucose control.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Science Citation Index).
- Inclusion of six randomized controlled trials involving 28,065 patients.
- Primary outcome measure: incidence of major macrovascular events.
Main Results:
- Intensive glucose treatment significantly decreased the incidence of major macrovascular events (RR 0.92; 95%CI 0.87, 0.98; P = 0.005).
- No significant differences observed in all-cause mortality (RR 0.95; 95%CI 0.80, 1.12; P = 0.55).
- No significant differences observed in cardiovascular death incidence (RR 1.10, 95%CI 0.79, 1.53; P = 0.57).
Conclusions:
- Achieving normal or near-normal glycemia in type 2 diabetes effectively reduces major macrovascular events.
- Intensive glucose control strategies did not show significant differences in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality compared to conventional strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
Type II Diabetes II: Pathophysiology
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...