Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods01:18

Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods

Different methods, such as visual observance of metal-ion indicators, spectroscopic techniques, and potentiometric methods, can determine the endpoint of an EDTA titration.
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a result, EDTA...
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Loughran et al. Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure and the Resting EEG: Exploring the Thermal Mechanism Hypothesis. <i>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health</i> 2019, <i>16</i>, 1505.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026
Same author

Alpha-EEG/EMG neurofeedback combined with binaural beats stimulation: A randomized placebo-controlled within-subject cross over study.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Exploring the mechanism of the age-related P3 anterior shift.

Brain research·2025
Same author

Effects of extreme acceleration, microgravity, and deceleration on Bacillus subtilis onboard a suborbital space flight.

NPJ microgravity·2025
Same author

Looking for Biomarkers Which May Explain Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance Attributed to Electromagnetic Fields (IEI-EMF): Does RF-EMF Exposure Influence Salivary Cortisol Response?

Bioelectromagnetics·2025
Same author

Characterization of the Core Temperature Response of Free-Moving Rats to 1.95 GHz Electromagnetic Fields.

Bioelectromagnetics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram
06:12

Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram

Published on: March 13, 2018

A test of four EOG correction methods using an improved validation technique.

Trieu T H Pham1, Rodney J Croft, Peter J Cadusch

  • 1Brain Sciences Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria 3122, Australia.

International Journal of Psychophysiology : Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology
|November 2, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Electrooculogram (EOG) correction methods improve electroencephalogram (EEG) data quality. Methods separately correcting vertical, horizontal eye movements, and blinks yielded the best results for artifact removal.

More Related Videos

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
10:10

Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: January 30, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram
06:12

Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram

Published on: March 13, 2018

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
10:10

Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: January 30, 2026

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Ocular artifacts significantly contaminate electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings.
  • Existing electrooculogram (EOG) correction methods' effectiveness requires robust validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel validation technique for EOG correction methods.
  • To compare the performance of four common EOG correction techniques using the new validation method.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized event-related potential (ERP) data from 24 subjects with embedded eye movements (EMs).
  • Developed and applied a 'Peak Difference' validation measure comparing N100 peaks from opposing polarity EMs.
  • Compared four distinct EOG correction algorithms.

Main Results:

  • All tested EOG correction methods outperformed uncorrected data.
  • Methods that independently addressed vertical EMs, horizontal EMs, and blinks using separate EOG channels showed superior performance.
  • Enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio of EOG channels further improved correction efficacy.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed 'Peak Difference' validation offers improved face validity for EOG correction studies.
  • Independent correction of different artifact types is crucial for effective EEG artifact removal.
  • Optimizing EOG signal quality enhances the accuracy of artifact correction.