Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026
07:36
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Subtle linguistic cues influence perceived blame and financial liability
Caitlin M Fausey1, Lera Boroditsky
1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. cfausey@indiana.edu
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|November 2, 2010
Summary
Language framing significantly impacts blame and punishment. Agentive descriptions increase perceived fault and financial penalties compared to non-agentive ones, even with visual evidence.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Linguistics
- Social Psychology
Background:
- Determining blame and punishment for negative events is complex.
- Linguistic framing may subtly influence these judgments.
- Understanding the role of language in legal and social contexts is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how agentive versus non-agentive linguistic descriptions of accidents affect blame attribution and punishment.
- To examine the influence of linguistic framing on event construal, even with established knowledge and visual information.
Main Methods:
- Three studies were conducted using accident scenarios.
- Participants judged blame and financial penalties based on subtly different linguistic descriptions (agentive vs. non-agentive verbs).
- Judgments were assessed even for well-known events and when video evidence was available.
Main Results:
- Agentive linguistic descriptions led to significantly higher attributions of blame.
- Participants requested greater financial penalties when descriptions were agentive.
- Linguistic framing influenced judgments regardless of prior knowledge or visual information.
Conclusions:
- Subtle linguistic differences in describing events can significantly shape how people construe those events.
- Language plays a critical role in attributing blame and determining punishment.
- These findings have important real-world implications for legal and social judgments.
More Related Videos
09:53Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery
Published on: March 13, 2026
06:51The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
Related Concept Videos
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
01:14Understanding Deception
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
01:29Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
00:56Attribution Theory
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958). An internal factor is an...
01:17Correspondence Bias
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...
02:05Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about the way you...