Vascular infarction by subcutaneous application of tissue factor targeted to tumor vessels with NGR-peptides:

Johannes Dreischalück1, Christian Schwöppe, Tilmann Spieker

  • 1Department of Medicine A, University of Muenster, D-48129 Muenster, Germany.

Insights

The fusion protein tTF-NGR targets tumor vasculature, inhibiting tumor growth and blood flow in mice. However, subcutaneous administration causes significant toxicity, including bleeding and organ damage, limiting its therapeutic potential.

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology
  • Oncology
  • Vascular Biology

Background:

  • Truncated tissue factor (tTF) fused with the NGR peptide targets aminopeptidase N (CD13) and integrin αvβ3, both upregulated on tumor endothelial cells.
  • These targets are crucial for tumor angiogenesis and vascular integrity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the anti-tumor efficacy and toxicity of the fusion protein tTF-NGR.
  • To investigate the mechanism of action and potential therapeutic window of tTF-NGR.

Main Methods:

  • In vitro flow cytometry to assess binding to endothelial cells.
  • In vivo studies in athymic mice bearing HT1080 fibrosarcoma xenografts.
  • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for tumor blood flow assessment.
  • Histological analysis for vascular disruption and toxicity evaluation.

Main Results:

  • tTF-NGR demonstrated specific binding to endothelial cells.
  • Subcutaneous injection of tTF-NGR significantly inhibited tumor growth and reduced tumor blood flow.
  • Histological analysis revealed vascular disruption, blood pooling, and thrombotic occlusion in tumors.
  • Significant toxicities, including skin bleeding, reduced performance, and thrombo-embolic events, were observed at therapeutic doses.
  • Lethality occurred within the therapeutic dose range, indicating a narrow or absent safe therapeutic window.

Conclusions:

  • tTF-NGR exhibits potent anti-tumor activity by targeting tumor vasculature.
  • Subcutaneous administration of tTF-NGR is associated with severe dose-limiting toxicities, precluding its safe clinical use via this route.
  • Intravenous infusion may represent a more favorable administration route, warranting further investigation.