Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling01:31

Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling

Osteoclasts are cells responsible for bone resorption and remodeling. They originate from hematopoietic progenitor cells present in the bone marrow. Numerous progenitor cells fuse to form multinucleated cells, each with 10-20 nuclei. A single osteoclast has a diameter of 150 to 200 µM. These cells have ruffled borders that break down the underlying bone tissue and release minerals such as calcium into the blood in bone resorption. Osteoclasts cling to bones with their ruffled edges during bone...
Bone Remodeling01:40

Bone Remodeling

Bone remodeling is a continuous and balanced process of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. In adults, it helps maintain bone mass and calcium homeostasis. While mechanical stress can stimulate turnover as part of the normal maintenance and reparative process, several hormones also regulate bone remodeling.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Monoamine Oxidase B (MAO-B) as an Inducer of Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Production and Myofibroblast Differentiation in Cardiac Fibroblasts of Mice.

Cells·2026
Same author

Bioprinted constructs of differentiated primary osteocytes: a co-culture model with osteoclasts for biomedical research.

Biofabrication·2026
Same author

Biphasic Bone Implants through Hybrid Extrusion Printing of Thermoplastic Poly(lactic-<i>co</i>-glycolic) acid and Strontium-Modified Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

Advancing Biomaterials Evaluation: A Human Quadruple Bone Cell Culture Reveals Molybdenum-Driven Pro-Osteogenic and Anti-osteoclastogenic Responses.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026
Same author

Osteoprotective effects of the neuropeptide VIP: insights from triple cultures of human osteocytes, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts.

Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Green volumetric bioprinting: building photosynthetically active structures with light-scattering microalgae.

Trends in biotechnology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

Novel ceramic bone replacement material Osbone® in a comparative in vitro study with osteoblasts.

Anne Bernhardt1, Anja Lode, Fabian Peters

  • 1Max Bergmann Center of Biomaterials and Institute for Materials Science, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. abernhardt@nano.tu-dresden.de

Clinical Oral Implants Research
|November 4, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study compared a new bone graft material called Osbone(®) with two established materials, Cerasorb M(®) and Bio-Oss(®). Researchers tested how well osteoblasts (bone-forming cells) adhere to, grow on, and differentiate into bone cells on these materials. They used several methods, including measuring DNA and enzyme activity, scanning electron microscopy, and gene expression analysis. The results showed that Osbone(®) supported cell growth and bone-related gene activity better than Bio-Oss(®), and similarly to Cerasorb M(®). These findings suggest Osbone(®) could be a good option for bone grafting in real-world applications.

Keywords:
hydroxyapatite bone graftosteoblast proliferationbone graft materialsin vitro bone regeneration

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Comprehensive Characterization of Tissue Mineralization in an Ex Vivo Model
07:29

Comprehensive Characterization of Tissue Mineralization in an Ex Vivo Model

Published on: September 27, 2024

Three-Dimensional Bone Extracellular Matrix Model for Osteosarcoma
08:07

Three-Dimensional Bone Extracellular Matrix Model for Osteosarcoma

Published on: April 12, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

Comprehensive Characterization of Tissue Mineralization in an Ex Vivo Model
07:29

Comprehensive Characterization of Tissue Mineralization in an Ex Vivo Model

Published on: September 27, 2024

Three-Dimensional Bone Extracellular Matrix Model for Osteosarcoma
08:07

Three-Dimensional Bone Extracellular Matrix Model for Osteosarcoma

Published on: April 12, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials development in regenerative medicine
  • Cellular responses to orthopedic implants
  • Calcium phosphate ceramics in bone tissue engineering

Background:

Calcium phosphate ceramics are widely used in bone regeneration due to their biocompatibility and structural similarity to natural bone. Among these, hydroxyapatite (HA) is a standard material for bone grafting applications. While established materials like Cerasorb M(®) and Bio-Oss(®) have been extensively studied, newer alternatives such as Osbone(®) are being evaluated for improved performance. Prior research has shown that osteoblast proliferation and differentiation are critical for successful bone integration with graft materials. However, the specific behavior of osteoblasts on Osbone(®) remains less characterized. This gap motivated a direct comparison of Osbone(®) with existing calcium phosphate grafts. The study aimed to clarify how Osbone(®) supports cell adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation. No prior work had resolved the comparative performance of Osbone(®) in these aspects. Understanding these interactions is essential for advancing graft material design.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro performance of Osbone(®), a novel hydroxyapatite-based bone graft material. The specific problem addressed was the lack of comparative data on Osbone(®) relative to established grafts like Cerasorb M(®) and Bio-Oss(®). The motivation was to determine whether Osbone(®) could support osteoblast proliferation and differentiation similarly to or better than existing options. The study focused on measuring cell adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation on Osbone(®). Researchers sought to quantify these effects using DNA content, LDH activity, and ALP activity. The goal was to assess Osbone(®)'s potential for in vivo applications. The study also aimed to compare Osbone(®) with two established materials in the same experimental conditions. This comparison would help identify whether Osbone(®) offers any advantages in bone regeneration.

Main Methods:

The study used SaOS-2 osteoblasts cultured on Osbone(®), Cerasorb M(®), and Bio-Oss(®) materials. Cell adhesion was assessed through MTT staining, which detects viable cells. Quantitative measures included DNA content and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity to evaluate proliferation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) provided qualitative insights into cell morphology. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was measured to assess osteogenic differentiation. Gene expression analysis using reverse transcriptase PCR examined osteogenic markers. The experiment spanned 28 days of cultivation to capture long-term effects. All measurements were conducted under standardized in vitro conditions to ensure comparability.

Main Results:

MTT staining confirmed viable cell attachment on all three materials after one day. DNA content and LDH activity showed significant proliferation on Osbone(®) and Cerasorb M(®), but not on Bio-Oss(®) after 28 days. Scanning electron microscopy revealed well-spread cell morphology on Osbone(®) and Cerasorb M(®). ALP activity increased over time on both Osbone(®) and Cerasorb M(®). Gene expression analysis detected osteogenic markers like ALP, osteonectin, osteopontin, and bone sialoprotein II on Osbone(®) and Cerasorb M(®). No such expression was observed on Bio-Oss(®) during the study period. These findings suggest Osbone(®) supports osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. The results indicate Osbone(®) is a viable alternative to existing graft materials.

Conclusions:

The study found that Osbone(®) supports osteoblast proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in vitro. These findings align with the observed ALP activity and gene expression patterns. The material's performance is comparable to Cerasorb M(®) but not to Bio-Oss(®). The absence of proliferation on Bio-Oss(®) suggests limitations in its osteoblast support. The well-spread cell morphology on Osbone(®) indicates favorable cell-material interactions. The increase in ALP activity supports the material's role in promoting osteogenesis. Gene expression data further confirms the osteogenic potential of Osbone(®). These results suggest Osbone(®) is a promising candidate for bone graft applications.

The study found that Osbone(®) supports osteoblast proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in vitro, similar to Cerasorb M(®), but not to Bio-Oss(®).

MTT cell vitality staining was used to confirm viable cell attachment on Osbone(®) after one day of cultivation.

SEM was used to observe the morphology of osteoblasts attached to Osbone(®) and other materials, providing qualitative insights into cell spread and structure.

Gene expression analysis using reverse transcriptase PCR evaluated the expression of osteogenic markers such as ALP, osteonectin, and osteopontin on Osbone(®).

The in vitro cultivation period lasted 28 days to assess long-term cell proliferation and differentiation on Osbone(®).

The authors suggest that Osbone(®) granules support osteoblast proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in vitro, making them promising candidates for in vivo applications.