Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026
Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging
Published on: April 8, 2016
The use of immunohistochemistry for diagnosis of prostate cancer
Katia R M Leite1, Miguel Srougi, Adriana Sanudo
1Laboratory of Medical Investigation, Division of Urology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil. katiaramos@uol.com.br
Purpose:
Atypical glands (ASAP) are diagnosed in 5.0% of prostate biopsies, and cancer identification in a rebiopsy is higher than 40.0%. The use of antibodies to mark basal cells is currently a common practice, in order to avoid rebiopsies. There has been no reported study that has reviewed characteristics of radical prostatectomies (RPs) when immunohistochemistry (IHC) was necessary for definitive diagnosis.
Materials And Methods:
Out of 4127 biopsies examined from 2004 to 2008, 144 (3.5%) were diagnosed with ASAP. IHC was performed using antibody anti-34ΒE12 and p63. The results of surgical specimens of 27 patients treated by RP after the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC) was made using IHC (Group 1) were compared with 1040 patients where IHC was not necessary (Group 2).
Results:
IHC helped to diagnose PC in 103 patients (71.5%). Twenty-seven (26.2%) underwent RP. In Group 1, two (7.4%) adenocarcinomas were insignificant versus 29 (2.9%) for Group 2. Patients from Group 1 were younger (p = 0.039), had lower Gleason scores (GS) (p < 0.001), lower percentage of Gleason pattern 4 (p < 0.001), and smaller tumors (p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
The use of IHC did not lead to diagnosis of insignificant tumors as illustrated by absence of differences in pathological stage or positive surgical margins in men submitted to RP. Therefore, our results suggest that this modality should be routinely used for a borderline biopsy and ASAP cases.
