Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bootstrapping01:24

Bootstrapping

The term "bootstrap" originated in the 19th century as a metaphor for self-improvement or achieving something independently, without external assistance. This concept extends to statistical bootstrapping, a self-contained method for estimating population parameters through resampling, even though it can be computationally intensive. Developed by the American statistician Dr. Bradley Efron in 1979, bootstrapping provides a robust way to perform inference when the original sample size is small or...
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
Data Collection by Experiments01:13

Data Collection by Experiments

Data collection is a systematic method of obtaining, observing, measuring, and analyzing accurate information. An experimental study is a standard method of data collection that involves the manipulation of the samples by applying some form of treatment prior to data collection. It refers to manipulating one variable to determine its changes on another variable. The sample subjected to treatment is known as “experimental units.”
An example of the experimental method is a public clinical trial...
Design Consideration01:22

Design Consideration

Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key aspect...
Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward a Common Set of Interface Requirements for Genomic Data Management: Scoping Review.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Correction: Gaze and Eye-Tracking Perspectives for Psychological Research: A Narrative Review of Advances From 2012 to 2025.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Gaze and Eye-Tracking Perspectives for Psychological Research: A Narrative Review of Advances From 2012 to 2025.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Measurement characteristics of WHODAS 2.0 and WHODAS-Child: a systematic review of global psychometric studies in specific populations since 2010.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same author

Enriching the neurocognitive model of technological cognition: the role of emotional and reward-related processes.

Cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same author

Methods and Assessment Tools for Therapeutic Assignment in Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review.

Cureus·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

An Assessment Method and Toolkit to Evaluate Keyboard Design on Smartphones
05:42

An Assessment Method and Toolkit to Evaluate Keyboard Design on Smartphones

Published on: October 5, 2020

The Bootstrap Discovery Behaviour (BDB): a new outlook on usability evaluation.

Simone Borsci1, Alessandro Londei, Stefano Federici

  • 1ECoNA-Interuniversity Centre for Research on Cognitive Processing in Natural and Artificial Systems, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. simone.borsci@gmail.com

Cognitive Processing
|November 4, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new Bootstrap Discovery Behaviour (BDB) model for usability evaluations suggests more experts and users are needed than the ROI model. This enhances the representativeness of findings, despite increased costs.

More Related Videos

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

An Assessment Method and Toolkit to Evaluate Keyboard Design on Smartphones
05:42

An Assessment Method and Toolkit to Evaluate Keyboard Design on Smartphones

Published on: October 5, 2020

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Usability Engineering
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • The Return on Investment (ROI) model by Nielsen and Landauer (1993) is debated for its limitations in estimating the optimal number of evaluators for interface usability.
  • Existing models often fail to account for a comprehensive set of variables crucial for accurate usability problem identification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate an alternative usability evaluation model, the Bootstrap Discovery Behaviour (BDB) model, which incorporates a wider range of variables.
  • To compare the BDB model's estimation of necessary evaluators against the traditional ROI model.

Main Methods:

  • The study adapted the bootstrap statistical model (Efron, 1979) to account for interface properties and the probability of sample discovery behavior representing the population.
  • Two experimental groups (users and experts) evaluated a website (http://www.serviziocivile.it).
  • The BDB model was applied to the usability problems identified by these groups.

Main Results:

  • The BDB model estimated that 13 experts and 20 users are required to identify 80% of usability problems.
  • This contrasts with the ROI model's estimation of 6 experts and 7 users for the same problem identification rate.
  • The BDB model necessitates a higher number of participants, leading to increased usability evaluation costs.

Conclusions:

  • The BDB model offers a more robust estimation of the number of experts and users needed for comprehensive usability evaluations.
  • While increasing costs, the BDB model provides a higher probability of representing the entire population of experts and users.
  • The findings advocate for the adoption of the BDB model for more reliable usability assessments.