Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Noble Gases02:54

Noble Gases


The elements in group 18 are noble gases (helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon, and radon). They earned the name “noble” because they were assumed to be nonreactive since they have filled valence shells. In 1962, Dr. Neil Bartlett at the University of British Columbia proved this assumption to be false.
Critical Thinking01:19

Critical Thinking

Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
Creative Thinking01:25

Creative Thinking

Creative thinking encompasses innovative and unconventional methods for addressing challenges, often leading to groundbreaking solutions. Instead of focusing solely on enhancing existing systems, such as increasing smartphone battery capacity, creative thinking might inspire advancements like energy-efficient batteries or processors that minimize power consumption. This multidimensional approach underscores the importance of exploring novel pathways to innovation.
Divergent thinking is the...
Egoism and Altruism01:55

Egoism and Altruism

Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
Critical Thinking I01:24

Critical Thinking I

Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career with...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

ClairS: a deep-learning method for long-read tumor-normal pair somatic small variant calling.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

RNAbpFlow: base pair-augmented SE(3) flow matching for conditional RNA 3D structure generation.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Spatio-DARLIN enables robust and efficient in situ lineage tracing in mice at single-cell resolution.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

EasyGrid: a versatile platform for automated cryo-EM sample preparation and quality control.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Cloud-based microscope enables live neuroimaging for 24 h and beyond with worldwide access.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Deep molecular profiling in three dimensions.

Nature methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

Nobel thoughts

    Nature Methods
    |November 5, 2010
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Scientists should celebrate Nobel Prizes, even when awarded across disciplines. Establishing a new prize could foster recognition and collaboration among diverse scientific fields.

    More Related Videos

    Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
    10:26

    Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

    Published on: September 11, 2021

    Perspectives on Neuroscience
    26:41

    Perspectives on Neuroscience

    Published on: July 31, 2007

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

    Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
    23:53

    Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

    Published on: April 29, 2007

    Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
    10:26

    Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

    Published on: September 11, 2021

    Perspectives on Neuroscience
    26:41

    Perspectives on Neuroscience

    Published on: July 31, 2007

    Area of Science:

    • Interdisciplinary Science
    • Scientific Recognition
    • Nobel Prize

    Background:

    • The Nobel Prize traditionally recognizes advancements within specific scientific disciplines.
    • Cross-disciplinary research is increasingly vital but may not always fit traditional award structures.
    • This highlights a potential gap in acknowledging collaborative or boundary-spanning scientific achievements.

    Discussion:

    • The scientific community benefits from celebrating all Nobel laureates, regardless of disciplinary boundaries.
    • Awards that bridge multiple fields can be seen as honoring adjacent disciplines.
    • This situation prompts reflection on how scientific prizes are structured and perceived.

    Key Insights:

    • Nobel Prize celebrations should be inclusive of all scientific endeavors.
    • Interdisciplinary work sometimes faces challenges in fitting established award categories.
    • A new prize could offer a dedicated platform for recognizing cross-disciplinary excellence.

    Outlook:

    • Consideration of a new prize to specifically honor interdisciplinary scientific achievements.
    • Encouraging broader recognition and celebration of science that transcends traditional fields.
    • Fostering a more unified and collaborative scientific community through inclusive awards.