Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026
Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Published on: October 27, 2014
Increased risk of serious hemorrhage with bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis
Sanjaykumar Hapani1, Amna Sher, David Chu
1Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY 11794-9447, USA.
Background:
The role of the widely-used angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab in the development of serious hemorrhage is not well defined in cancer patients. This study was conducted to determine the overall risk of hemorrhage with bevacizumab by a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT).
Methods:
Databases from PubMed and the Web of Science from January 1966 to May 2009 and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) conferences from January 2000 to May 2009 were searched to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included prospective RCTs in which bevacizumab was compared to controls concurrently with antineoplastic therapy. Summary incidence rates, relative risks (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models.
Results:
A total of 12,617 patients with a variety of solid tumors from 20 RCTs were included for analysis. The incidence of all-grade hemorrhage was 30.4% (95% CI 21.5-40.9), with 3.5% (95% CI 2.2-5.7%) being high grade (grade 3-5). Overall, bevacizumab significantly increased the risk of bleeding with an RR of 2.48 (95% CI 1.93-3.18) when compared to the controls, with RRs of 3.02 (95% CI 2.42-3.78) and 2.01 (95% CI 1.43-2.83) at 5 and 2.5 mg/kg/week, respectively. Significantly increased risks for epistaxis or pulmonary hemorrhage were observed. In addition, bevacizumab significantly increased the risk of high-grade bleeding with an RR of 1.91 (95% CI 1.36-2.68). The risk of fatal bleeding was low (0.8%; 95% CI 0.4-1.7), and significantly elevated only in lung cancer (RR 5.02; 95% CI 1.52-16.66).
Conclusion:
Bevacizumab may significantly increase the risk of serious hemorrhage in cancer patients.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
02:49Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
01:30Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management