The adiabatic approximation in time-dependent density matrix functional theory: response properties from dynamics of...

The adiabatic approximation is problematic in time-dependent density matrix functional theory. With pure density matrix functionals (invariant under phase change of the natural orbitals) it leads to lack of response in the occupation numbers, hence wrong frequency dependent responses, in particular α(ω→0)≠α(0) (the static polarizability). We propose to relinquish the requirement that the functional must be a pure one-body reduced density matrix (1RDM) functional, and to introduce additional variables which can be interpreted as phases of the one-particle states of the independent particle reference system formed with the natural orbitals, thus obtaining so-called phase-including natural orbital (PINO) functionals. We also stress the importance of the correct choice of the complex conjugation in the two-electron integrals in the commonly used functionals (they should not be of exchange type). We demonstrate with the Löwdin-Shull energy expression for two-electron systems, which is an example of a PINO functional, that for two-electron systems exact responses (polarizabilities, excitation energies) are obtained, while writing this energy expression in the usual way as a 1RDM functional yields erroneous responses.