Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:

Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System

Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System

The issues and trends in healthcare delivery are constantly changing. The COVID-19 pandemic is one recent issue that wreaked havoc on healthcare systems, causing a shortage of healthcare workers, high demand for medicines and supplies, and increased medical expenditure due to a lack of insurance. Other issues include rising healthcare costs and care fragmentation.
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Virtual Practice Facilitation and Implementation of Cardiovascular Quality Improvement Strategies in Primary Care Clinics: A Descriptive Study.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026

Same author

Adaptation of a cardiovascular quality improvement initiative for worksite health centers: application of the ADAPT-ITT framework.

Implementation science communications·2026

Same author

What Matters to You, Matters to Us: A Case Study on Leveraging the Electronic Health Record for Patient-Centered Care.

Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality·2025

Same author

Rationale and design for Healthy Hearts in Manufacturing (HHM): A pragmatic single-arm hybrid effectiveness-implementation study for hypertension management and tobacco cessation.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2025

Same author

Design of INSPIRE: Evaluation of the effectiveness of practice facilitation on implementation of screening, brief interventions, referral to treatment and medication for unhealthy alcohol use identification and treatment in primary care.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2025

Same author

Implementation of medications for opioid use disorder in U.S. emergency departments: A systematic review.

Journal of substance use and addiction treatment·2024

Same journal

The Association Between Sepsis Coding and Payment to U.S. Hospitals.

Health services research·2026

Same journal

Stagnation in Achieving Recommended Methadone Doses in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment.

Health services research·2026

Same journal

Promoting Transplant Access Through Dialysis Facility Performance Metrics: A Double-Edged Sword.

Health services research·2026

Same journal

Understanding Medicaid Estate Recovery: The Experience of North Carolina and Policy Implications for Future Reforms.

Health services research·2026

Same journal

Racial Disparities and Personal Responsibility Incentives in Medicaid.

Health services research·2026

Same journal

Under-Documentation of Z-Codes in Hospitalizations of Homeless Shelter Users in New York City.

Health services research·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Improving evaluations of value-based purchasing programs.

Megan McHugh¹, Maulik Joshi

¹Health Research & Educational Trust, 155 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 400, Chicago, IL 60654, USA. mmchugh@aha.org

Health Services Research

|November 9, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Value-based purchasing (VBP) shows promise for healthcare quality and cost control, but effective program evaluation is lacking. This commentary suggests improvements in implementation and impact research to better inform VBP policy and practice.

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Area of Science:

Health Services Research
Healthcare Policy
Program Evaluation

Background:

Value-based purchasing (VBP) is a strategy to improve healthcare quality and manage costs.
Current evidence on optimal VBP program structure and implementation is limited.
Effective evaluation is crucial for successful VBP initiatives.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify key issues for enhancing the evaluation of VBP programs.
To provide recommendations for improving implementation and impact research.
To inform policy and practice related to VBP.

Main Methods:

Commentary synthesizing current knowledge on VBP evaluation.
Identification of areas for improvement in implementation research.
Identification of areas for improvement in impact research.

Main Results:

Implementation research requires early, continuous assessment and varied program designs.
Impact research necessitates improved outcome measures, linked patient data, and advanced synthesis.
Recommendations are provided for strengthening the foundation for VBP program evaluations.

Conclusions:

Enhancing VBP program evaluations is essential for realizing their potential.
Improvements in research methodologies will lead to better-informed policy and practice.
Further research is needed to optimize VBP program design and outcomes.