Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026
Modification and Functionalization of the Guanidine Group by Tailor-made Precursors
Published on: April 27, 2017
Multivalent cyclic RGD ligands: influence of linker lengths on receptor binding
Holger Kubas1, Martin Schäfer, Ulrike Bauder-Wüst
1Department of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Unlabelled:
Peptides involving the RGD motive (arginine-glycine-aspartic acid) recognize members of the integrin receptor family. Since the receptors are located mainly on the surface of endothelial cells, structural modifications including multimers of c(RGDfE) were recently found to improve the binding avidity for α(v)β(3) integrin significantly. The multivalent RGD peptides exhibited rather loose linkages partly including oligo(ethylene glycol) spacers (EG(n)) with different chain lengths. Therefore, the dependence of multivalent RGD systems with and without EG(n) linkers were investigated on their binding properties to cultured α(v)β(3) integrin-expressing U87MG cells.
Methods:
We synthesized a series of di-, tri- and tetravalent rigid scaffolds (terephthalic acid, trimesic acid and adamantane-1,3,5,7-tetracarboxylic acid) conjugated to c(RGDyK) ligands, which were linked contiguously or separated by the oligo(ethylene glycol) spacers. The inhibition constants of these c(RGDyK) derivatives were determined by competition assays with (125)I-labeled echistatin.
Results:
While c(RGDyK) function is a relative weak competitor against [(125)I]echistatin (K(i), 329 ± 18 nM) for α(v)β(3) integrin-expressing U87MG cells, RGD dimers improved the competition potency considerably (K(i), 64 ± 23 nM). This effect was even more pronounced with the RGD trimers (K(i), 40 ± 7 nM) and tetramers (K(i), 26±9 nM). The introduction of EG(n) spacers and the increase of linker lengths proved to be detrimental since more competitors were needed to compete with [(125)I]echistatin. The EG(6) group, for example, reduced the inhibition constants by 29% (dimer), 57% (trimer) and 97% (tetramer).
Conclusion:
The binding experiments performed with the three forms of multivalent RGD ligands indicate the weakening of competitive potency against [(125)I]echistatin with the introduction of EG(n) spacers. This effect may be related to the decrease of the effective RGD molarity, which becomes most prominent within the tetravalent series.
Related Concept Videos
00:49Ligand Binding and Linkage
00:49Ligand Binding and Linkage
01:12GPCR Desensitization
02:40Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
02:40Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
01:15G Protein-coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...