You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
Published on: April 9, 2019
Gregory S Fischer1, Iulian Iordachita, Csaba Csoma
1Engineering Research Center for Computer Integrated Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA.
This article introduces a specialized robotic system designed to assist doctors in performing precise prostate biopsies or treatments while the patient is inside a high-field MRI scanner. By using pneumatic power instead of electricity, the robot avoids interference with the scanner's magnetic field, allowing for safer and more accurate needle guidance during complex medical procedures.
Area of Science:
Background:
Magnetic resonance imaging offers exceptional three-dimensional views of the prostate gland and nearby anatomical structures. This capability suggests it could serve as an ideal modality for guiding interventional procedures. Yet, clinicians struggle to utilize these benefits during actual operations. High-field scanners create harsh environments that prevent the use of standard electronic equipment. The intense magnetic forces and restricted physical space limit human access to the patient. No prior work had resolved these specific engineering hurdles for transperineal interventions. That uncertainty drove the development of specialized hardware capable of operating safely within these scanners. This paper addresses the need for reliable robotic assistance in such demanding clinical settings.
Purpose Of The Study:
The study aims to design a robotic assistant capable of performing safe needle placement within high-field scanners. Researchers sought to overcome the physical access limitations inherent in closed imaging environments. They addressed the incompatibility of conventional electronic mechatronics with strong magnetic fields. The team focused on creating a system that maintains high precision during complex prostatic interventions. This work was motivated by the need for improved guidance during biopsies and localized treatments. They intended to provide a solution that allows clinicians to harness the superior visualization offered by advanced imaging. The authors aimed to validate the robot's performance through both technical and phantom-based assessments. This effort seeks to bridge the gap between high-quality imaging and practical interventional utility.
Main Methods:
The investigators developed a robotic assistant specifically for transperineal access during imaging. They utilized pneumatic actuators to bypass the constraints of traditional electromagnetic motors. The team integrated this hardware with a dedicated controller to manage movement. They performed rigorous testing under 3T magnetic field conditions to verify compatibility. The researchers employed standard imaging sequences to quantify potential interference with the scanner. They conducted phantom trials to simulate real-world targeting scenarios. The approach involved measuring the root mean square error to determine positional precision. This methodology focused on validating both the mechanical stability and the imaging integrity of the integrated platform.
Main Results:
The system achieved an average needle alignment accuracy of better than 0.94 mm root mean square per axis. Testing under 3T conditions revealed that the average signal-to-noise ratio loss remained limited to 5%. The researchers successfully targeted five out of five 1 cm lesions during simulated phantom evaluations. These findings demonstrate that the robot functions reliably within the restricted space of a closed scanner. The data indicate that the pneumatic control scheme provides consistent performance across all tested axes. The imaging results confirm that the device does not significantly degrade the quality of the prostate visualization. The study shows that the complete workflow supports accurate needle guidance for the specified targets. These metrics validate the efficacy of the robotic design for interventional applications.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that their pneumatic design successfully enables robotic assistance within high-field scanners. This system demonstrates that accurate needle placement remains achievable despite the challenging magnetic environment. The researchers suggest that the observed signal-to-noise ratio loss remains within acceptable clinical limits. Their findings indicate that servo pneumatic control provides sufficient precision for targeting small prostatic lesions. The team concludes that the integration of this robot into existing workflows is feasible for future clinical adoption. This study confirms that the robotic assistant maintains high targeting accuracy during phantom trials. The authors imply that their approach overcomes the primary limitations associated with conventional mechatronics in MRI suites. These results support the potential for improved procedural outcomes in prostate interventions.
The researchers propose a pneumatic-driven robotic assistant. This mechanism utilizes air pressure to manipulate needle positioning, which avoids the electromagnetic interference typically caused by standard electric motors inside high-field scanners. This approach ensures the device remains functional without disrupting the imaging process.
The system employs a servo pneumatic controller. This component manages the air-driven actuators to ensure precise needle alignment. By regulating pressure, the controller achieves an accuracy of better than 0.94 mm root mean square per axis during operation.
A high-field environment is necessary because it provides superior soft-tissue contrast compared to lower-field alternatives. However, this environment requires non-ferromagnetic materials and pneumatic power to prevent image distortion and ensure the safety of the patient during the intervention.
The study utilizes phantom models to validate the system workflow. These synthetic objects allow the researchers to test the targeting of 1 cm lesions, confirming that the robot can successfully reach and visualize all five targets during simulated procedures.
The researchers measured the signal-to-noise ratio to assess image quality. They reported that the average loss in signal strength is limited to 5% when the robot operates under 3T MRI conditions, indicating minimal impact on the imaging performance.
The authors propose that this robotic system could enhance the safety and reliability of intraprostatic needle placement. They suggest that this technology may eventually allow for more effective interventions by overcoming the physical access constraints inherent in closed scanner designs.