How to optimize current (available) diagnostic tests

Isolation of mycobacterium tuberculosis is the gold standard in the diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis. However, it has inherent limitations due to paucibacillary nature of the disease in children and technical difficulties encountered in collection of appropriate sample. Thus, diagnosis is dependent on circumstantial evidence at best supported by conventional tests such as tuberculin test and chest radiograph. Several new tests are being developed but they lack ideal sensitivity and specificity. Hence, it is important to optimise use of current diagnostic tests. Clinical suspicion based on protocol developed by IAP is a pre-requisite of ordering tests and it is only then that proper interpretation is possible. Tuberculin skin test is still a useful screening test. It does help in establishing presence of infection though not necessarily disease. Attention must be paid to ideal test solution, proper technique and cautious interpretation. BCG test is not recommended. Miliary shadows and fibrocaseious cavitary lesions in chest radiograph are highly suggestive of tuberculosis in our epidemiology. CT scan is rarely necessary and is not cost and radiation-effective. It is ideal to attempt bacteriological examination in every suspected case of childhood tuberculosis. Most practical method is collection of gastric aspirate for smear and culture. It is possible to carry out this procedure in out-patient clinic. Better yield is likely with increasing expertise especially in extensive disease. Bronchoalveolar lavage is an invasive test and bacterial yield is comparable to that of gastric aspirate. Tissue collected for histopathological examination must be submitted for bacteriological tests. PCR is not easily available. It has high sensitivity but lower specificity and thus, is not routinely recommended. Serology has no place in diagnosis of tuberculosis. Interferon gamma release assays are also now available. Sensitivity and specificity of Quantiferon Gold and T-spot tests have not been studied in children and hence are not recommended in routine practice. Instead of trying newer tests, it may be best to avail an expert advice in difficult cases.