Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification of Prions
Published on: November 7, 2012
Molecular biology and pathology of prion strains in sporadic human prion diseases
Pierluigi Gambetti1, Ignazio Cali, Silvio Notari
1Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, 2085 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. pxg13@case.edu
Abstract:
Prion diseases are believed to propagate by the mechanism involving self-perpetuating conformational conversion of the normal form of the prion protein, PrP(C), to the misfolded, pathogenic state, PrP(Sc). One of the most intriguing aspects of these disorders is the phenomenon of prion strains. It is believed that strain properties are fully encoded in distinct conformations of PrP(Sc). Strains are of practical relevance to human prion diseases as their diversity may explain the unusual heterogeneity of these disorders. The first insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying heterogeneity of human prion diseases was provided by the observation that two distinct disease phenotypes and their associated PrP(Sc) conformers co-distribute with distinct PrP genotypes as determined by the methionine/valine polymorphism at codon 129 of the PrP gene. Subsequent studies identified six possible combinations of the three genotypes (determined by the polymorphic codon 129) and two common PrP(Sc) conformers (named types 1 and 2) as the major determinants of the phenotype in sporadic human prion diseases. This scenario implies that each 129 genotype-PrP(Sc) type combination would be associated with a distinct disease phenotype and prion strain. However, notable exceptions have been found. For example, two genotype-PrP(Sc) type combinations are linked to the same phenotype, and conversely, the same combination was found to be associated with two distinct phenotypes. Furthermore, in some cases, PrP(Sc) conformers naturally associated with distinct phenotypes appear, upon transmission, to lose their phenotype-determining strain characteristics. Currently it seems safe to assume that typical sporadic prion diseases are associated with at least six distinct prion strains. However, the intrinsic characteristics that distinguish at least four of these strains remain to be identified.
Insights
Prion diseases involve misfolded prion proteins (PrPSc) and distinct strains. While genotype and PrPSc type influence disease, exceptions suggest more complex strain characteristics in human prion diseases.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
Background:
- Prion diseases propagate via misfolding of the prion protein (PrP(C)) into pathogenic forms (PrP(Sc)).
- Prion strains, defined by PrP(Sc) conformations, contribute to disease heterogeneity.
- Prion protein genotype at codon 129 influences disease phenotype.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the molecular basis of human prion disease heterogeneity.
- To understand the relationship between prion protein genotype, PrP(Sc) conformers, and disease phenotypes.
- To identify the number and characteristics of distinct prion strains.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of prion protein (PrP) genotypes at codon 129.
- Characterization of distinct PrP(Sc) conformers (types 1 and 2).
- Correlation of genotype-PrP(Sc) type combinations with disease phenotypes in sporadic human prion diseases.
Main Results:
- Six genotype-PrP(Sc) type combinations were identified as major determinants of sporadic human prion disease phenotypes.
- Exceptions were observed where combinations linked to the same phenotype or the same combination linked to different phenotypes.
- Some PrP(Sc) conformers lost strain characteristics upon transmission, indicating complex strain behavior.
Conclusions:
- Sporadic human prion diseases are associated with at least six distinct prion strains.
- The interplay between PrP genotype and PrP(Sc) conformation is complex and does not fully explain all observed disease phenotypes.
- Further research is needed to identify the intrinsic characteristics distinguishing at least four of these prion strains.
Related Concept Videos
Amyloid Fibrils
Amyloid deposits were observed as early as 1639 in the liver and the spleen. In 1854, Rudolph Virchow performed iodine staining, normally used to...
Amyloid Fibrils
Amyloid deposits were observed as early as 1639 in the liver and the spleen. In 1854, Rudolph Virchow performed iodine staining, normally used to...
Parkinson Disease ll: Pathophysiology
Subviral Agents
Alzheimer Disease ll: Pathophysiology

