Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Unrealistic Optimism Bias01:30

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Magical Thinking01:29

Magical Thinking

Magical thinking encompasses the belief in assumptions that defy logical reasoning yet appear intuitively convincing. It is a common psychological phenomenon that persists across various cultural and individual contexts. While these assumptions contradict empirical evidence and scientific laws, they often serve meaningful psychological roles in promoting emotional resilience and a sense of control, especially under stress or uncertainty.Thought-Action Fusion and the Law of SimilarityA key...
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Schemas01:42

Schemas

A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anchoring the anchor: judgments of both items assimilate in item-based anchoring.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Human Rationality.

Annual review of psychology·2025
Same author

Capturing Argument in Agent-Based Models.

Topoi : an international review of philosophy·2025
Same author

Decision making under extinction risk.

Cognitive psychology·2025
Same author

The Limited Place in Cognitive Space.

Topics in cognitive science·2025
Same author

From preference shifts to information leaks: Examining Individuals' sensitivity to information leakage in the framing effect.

Cognition·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Unrealistic optimism about future life events: a cautionary note.

Adam J L Harris1, Ulrike Hahn

  • 1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales. adam.harris@ucl.ac.uk

Psychological Review
|November 10, 2010
PubMed
Summary

People may not be unrealistically optimistic about risks. Statistical artifacts in studies may explain why negative events seem less likely to happen to individuals than to others.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Risk Perception

Background:

  • Social psychology research consistently finds people perceive negative life events as less probable for themselves compared to the average person.
  • This phenomenon is widely interpreted as evidence of unrealistic optimism in risk assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether statistical artifacts, rather than genuine optimism, could account for observed patterns in comparative risk judgments.
  • To re-evaluate the evidence for an optimistic bias in risk perception.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing data from unrealistic optimism studies.
  • Examination of the impact of sampling constraints, response scale limitations, and event rarity on risk judgments.
  • Statistical modeling to differentiate between genuine bias and artifactual effects.

Main Results:

  • Data patterns previously attributed to unrealistic optimism can arise from statistical properties of the data and response scales.
  • The rarity of negative events, combined with sampling constraints, can create an illusion of optimism.
  • The magnitude and mechanisms of optimistic bias may be overestimated due to these artifacts.

Conclusions:

  • The existence and extent of an optimistic bias in risk perception are questionable.
  • Statistical artifacts significantly complicate the interpretation of existing research on unrealistic optimism.
  • Further research is needed to accurately determine the prevalence, causes, and influencing factors of any genuine optimistic bias in risk perception.