Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy--a single centre 10 year experience
Syed Javid Farooq Qadri1, Naveed Khan, Muneer Khan
1Dept of Surgery, Govt Medical College Srinagar, J&K, India. drjavid11@gmail.com
International Journal of Surgery (London, England)
|November 10, 2010
Summary
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RLU) effectively treats ureteral stones, offering 100% clearance. This minimally invasive approach is valuable as a primary or salvage procedure, especially where advanced equipment is limited.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Standard ureteric stone management includes ureteroscopy (URS), shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), and HO:YAG laser.
- Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is an alternative for failed URS/SWL or large impacted stones.
- Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RLU) offers a less invasive route compared to transperitoneal approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To share a decade of experience with retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RLU).
- To evaluate RLU as a primary or salvage procedure for ureteral calculi.
- To highlight RLU's efficacy in resource-limited settings.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 126 RLU procedures for ureteral stones between January 2000 and January 2010.
- Indications included primary treatment for large impacted stones (68.25%), failed URS (22.23%), and failed SWL (9.52%).
Main Results:
- RLU achieved a 97.6% success rate with a mean operative time of 88 minutes.
- The most common complication was inadvertent peritoneotomy (11.9%).
- Mean hospital stay was 2.8 days, with 2.38% experiencing prolonged urinary drainage.
Conclusions:
- RLU is a highly effective, minimally invasive treatment for ureteral stones, achieving 100% stone clearance.
- It serves as a salvage procedure in advanced centers but can be a primary option in developing nations.
- RLU offers excellent results with minimal resources for upper and mid-ureteric stones.

