Related Experiment Videos

Implications of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial for antiarrhythmic drug treatment

J T Bigger1

  • 1Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032.

Insights

The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial found that suppressing ventricular arrhythmias after heart attack increased death rates. Antiarrhythmic drugs like encainide and flecainide were removed due to harm.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Post-myocardial infarction patients with left ventricular dysfunction are at risk for ventricular arrhythmias.
  • The effectiveness of suppressing these arrhythmias in reducing mortality was uncertain.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the hypothesis that suppressing ventricular arrhythmias in post-MI patients with left ventricular dysfunction reduces arrhythmic death.
  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs in this patient population.

Main Methods:

  • Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial (Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial - CAST).
  • Enrollment of patients <80 years with ventricular premature complexes and LVEF ≤40%.
  • Antiarrhythmic drug titration to suppress arrhythmias, followed by randomization to drug or placebo.

Main Results:

  • Encainide and flecainide were withdrawn due to a 2.5-fold increase in death rate.
  • No subgroups benefited from treatment; all experienced harm or were not evaluable.
  • Adverse effects were uniform across all patient subgroups.

Conclusions:

  • Suppression of ventricular arrhythmias with encainide and flecainide is harmful in post-MI patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
  • The study demonstrated a detrimental effect of these antiarrhythmic drugs, challenging previous assumptions.

Related Concept Videos