Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Cox-Maze IV Procedure Concomitant with Valvular Surgery In Situs Inversus Dextrocardia: A Single-Center Experience in China
Published on: February 11, 2022
Evolving indications for tricuspid valve surgery
Patrick M McCarthy1, Virna L Sales
1Division of Cardiac Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 201 East Huron Street, Suite 11-140, Chicago, IL, 60611-2908, USA, pmccart@nmh.org.
Insights
Guidelines for tricuspid valve (TV) surgery remain unclear, especially for less severe regurgitation (TR) or when not combined with mitral valve surgery. Recent publications offer improved guidance for TV repair and replacement decisions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Clinical Guidelines
Background:
- The tricuspid valve (TV) receives less attention than the mitral valve (MV), leading to ambiguity in surgical timing for tricuspid regurgitation (TR).
- Existing guidelines present areas of agreement, disagreement, and silence regarding TV surgery indications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current guidelines (ACC/AHA, ESC) for tricuspid valve surgery.
- To clarify decision-making for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) management, particularly in the context of mitral valve surgery and other clinical scenarios.
- To synthesize recent evidence on tricuspid valve repair and replacement outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology guidelines.
- Review of recent scientific literature on tricuspid valve surgery outcomes.
- Expert opinion synthesis from Northwestern University regarding guideline interpretation and application.
Main Results:
- Guidelines show concordance for severe TR during MV surgery.
- Discordance exists for less severe TR with recurrence risk factors (e.g., pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation).
- Guidelines are silent on TR in patients undergoing non-MV operations, and primary TR surgery indications require further clarification.
Conclusions:
- Current guidelines offer partial clarity on tricuspid valve surgery timing, especially in complex cases.
- Emerging data on TV repair and replacement are crucial for refining surgical decision-making.
- Further research and guideline refinement are needed for optimal management of tricuspid regurgitation.
Opinion Statement:
More attention has been paid to the mitral valve (MV) than the tricuspid valve (TV), and this relative paucity of data has led to confusion regarding the timing of TV surgery. We review the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology guidelines to identify areas of concordance (severe tricuspid regurgitation [TR] in a patient undergoing mitral valve surgery); discordance (less than severe TR but with markers for late TR recurrence such as pulmonary hypertension, a dilated TV annulus, atrial fibrillation, permanent transtricuspid pacing wires and others); and disagreement (surgery for primary TR). We provide our perspective from Northwestern University on these issues and where the guidelines are silent (TR in patients undergoing non-mitral valve operations). Finally, we review recent publications on the results of TV repair and replacement. Although there have been scant publications in the past, there have been more useful publications in recent years to guide our decision making.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
