Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Clinical benefit of early phase clinical trial participation for advanced sarcoma patients
Robin L Jones1, David Olmos, Khin Thway
1Royal Marsden Hospital, London, SW3 6JJ, UK. rjones@seattlecca.org
Purpose:
Standard systemic treatment options for patients with advanced sarcoma are limited. Depending on the histological subtype, patients receive differing lines of therapy usually consisting of doxorubicin, ifosfamide and/or trabectedin. After progression on conventional therapies, some patients are offered more experimental options including Phase I clinical trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit for sarcoma patients treated within the Phase I Unit of a single referral centre.
Methods:
The response, toxicity and outcome of sarcoma patients treated within Phase I clinical trials at the Royal Marsden between August 1998 and December 2010 were analysed.
Results:
One hundred and thirty-three patients were treated. The median number of prior systemic therapies was 3 (range 0-6). The median age of these patients was 48.0 years (range 12.5-81.9), with a male/female ratio of 71/62. One patient (0.8%) achieved a complete response and 2 (1.6%) partial responses. The non-progression rate at 3 and 6 months was 31.5% (95% CI, 23.4-39.6%) and 11.0% (95% CI 5.6-16.5%), respectively. The median progression-free survival was 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.7-2.5), and median overall survival was 7.6 months (95% CI, 4.8-10.4). Twenty-four (18.0%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity, and 16 (12.0%) stopped trial treatment due to toxicity.
Conclusion:
Phase I clinical trials could be considered a therapeutic option in sarcoma patients with no remaining standard treatment due to the low risk of toxicity and the potential for clinical benefit.
Insights
Phase I clinical trials offer a valuable therapeutic option for advanced sarcoma patients lacking standard treatments. These trials demonstrate potential clinical benefit with manageable toxicity, providing a crucial pathway for further care.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Sarcoma Research
Background:
- Standard systemic treatments for advanced sarcoma are limited, often involving doxorubicin, ifosfamide, or trabectedin.
- Patients progressing on conventional therapies may be offered experimental options like Phase I clinical trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical benefit of Phase I clinical trials for sarcoma patients.
- To assess the response, toxicity, and outcomes in sarcoma patients treated within a Phase I Unit.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of sarcoma patients treated in Phase I clinical trials at a single referral center.
- Data collection spanned from August 1998 to December 2010, including response, toxicity, and survival outcomes.
Main Results:
- 133 patients with a median of 3 prior systemic therapies were treated.
- Objective response rates were low (1.6% partial response), but 3-month non-progression rate was 31.5%.
- Median progression-free survival was 2.1 months, median overall survival was 7.6 months, with 18.0% experiencing grade 3/4 toxicity.
Conclusions:
- Phase I clinical trials represent a viable therapeutic option for sarcoma patients with no remaining standard treatment options.
- The potential for clinical benefit and relatively low toxicity risk support their consideration in advanced sarcoma management.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Cancer Survival Analysis
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
