Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

VSEPR Theory02:37

VSEPR Theory

Valence shell electron-pair repulsion theory (VSEPR theory) enables us to predict the molecular structure around a central atom from an examination of the number of bonds and lone electron pairs in its Lewis structure. The VSEPR model assumes that electron pairs in the valence shell of a central atom will adopt an arrangement that minimizes repulsions between these electron pairs by maximizing the distance between them. The electrons in the valence shell of a central atom form either bonding...
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes02:58

Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes

Crystal Field Theory
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes02:46

Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes

Tetrahedral Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Electron Orbital Model01:18

Electron Orbital Model

Orbitals are the areas outside of the atomic nucleus where electrons are most likely to reside. They are characterized by different energy levels, shapes, and three-dimensional orientations. The location of electrons is described most generally by a shell or principal energy level, then by a subshell within each shell, and finally, by individual orbitals found within the subshells.The first shell is closest to the nucleus, and it has only one subshell with a single spherical orbital called the...
VSEPR Theory and the Basic Shapes02:52

VSEPR Theory and the Basic Shapes

Overview of VSEPR Theory
Molecular Models02:00

Molecular Models

Physical models representing molecular architectures of chemical compounds play essential roles in understanding chemistry. The use of molecular models makes it easier to visualize the structures and shapes of atoms and molecules.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

65 years of electron transfer.

The Journal of chemical physics·2022
Same author

Reorganization Energy of Electron Transfer in Ionic Liquids.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2022
Same author

Electron-Induced Proton Transfer.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2021
Same author

Bob Cave Memorial.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2021
Same author

Computational Analysis of Electron Transfer Kinetics for CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction with Organic Photoredox Catalysts.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2020
Same author

Optical Absorption by Charge-Transfer Molecules.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2019
Same journal

Donor-Acceptor Separation Augments Temperature Dependence of Kinetic Isotope Effects in NADH Model Hydride Transfer Reactions: Mimicking Enzyme versus Mutant Dynamics.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same journal

Disordered Worm-Like Clusters in a Hexagonal Mesophase Former: Simulation and Thermodynamic Description.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same journal

Comparative Biophysical Analysis of Healthy and Inflamed Intestinal Membrane Models Using Langmuir Monolayers.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same journal

Phosphoserine Charge State Drives Ion Condensation and Spatial Polyamine Presentation in Multirepeat Silaffin.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same journal

pH-Dependent Conformational Transition of the Glutamate-GABA Antiporter GadC Revealed by <sup>19</sup>F NMR.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same journal

Hydrogen-Bond Network in Equimolar <i>N</i>-Methylacetamide-Water: Integrated Neutron Scattering, Molecular Dynamics, DFT-NBO-AIM, and Machine Learning Analysis.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Modeling Ligands into Maps Derived from Electron Cryomicroscopy
09:30

Modeling Ligands into Maps Derived from Electron Cryomicroscopy

Published on: July 19, 2024

Reduced electronic spaces for modeling donor/acceptor interactions.

Robert J Cave1, Stephen T Edwards, J Andrew Kouzelos

  • 1Department of Chemistry, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California 91711, USA. robert_cave@hmc.edu

The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B
|November 13, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The generalized Mulliken Hush model accurately estimates electron transfer coupling elements using a 2-state model. This approach provides reliable results comparable to more complex methods for donor-acceptor interactions.

More Related Videos

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
08:04

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Modeling Ligands into Maps Derived from Electron Cryomicroscopy
09:30

Modeling Ligands into Maps Derived from Electron Cryomicroscopy

Published on: July 19, 2024

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
08:04

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Physical Chemistry
  • Quantum Chemistry
  • Electron Transfer Theory

Background:

  • Electron transfer (ET) processes are fundamental in chemistry and biology.
  • Accurate calculation of coupling elements (H(DA)) is crucial for understanding ET rates.
  • The generalized Mulliken Hush (GMH) model offers a framework for diabatic state formulation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To formulate and evaluate diabatic states and coupling elements within the GMH model.
  • To assess the convergence and accuracy of the GMH model with increasing electronic state space size (n).
  • To compare GMH results with experimental data and other theoretical approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the generalized Mulliken Hush (GMH) model for diabatic state formulation.
  • Employed an effective 1-electron Hamiltonian and Kohn-Sham orbitals/energies.
  • Calculated coupling elements (H(DA)) and effective D/A separation distances (r(DA)) for variable state spaces (n=2-6).
  • Performed calculations on three mixed-valence binuclear Ru complexes.

Main Results:

  • The 2-state (2-st) model provides the most appropriate estimate of effective coupling.
  • GMH 2-st coupling values are similar (within 15% rms deviation) to superexchange-corrected values from larger spaces.
  • H(DA) remains quasi-invariant for n=2-6, indicating model convergence.
  • Larger state spaces lead to more localized states and weaker coupling, approaching 'through space' interactions.

Conclusions:

  • The 2-state GMH model is a reliable and computationally efficient method for estimating ET coupling.
  • The model successfully reconciles different theoretical assertions regarding multistate frameworks in ET.
  • Results provide insights into the role of bridge states in mediating donor-acceptor coupling.