Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026
09:51
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Responsiveness and minimal important differences after revision total hip arthroplasty.
Hon-Yi Shi1, Je-Ken Chang, Chi-Yin Wong
1Graduate Institute of Healthcare Administration, Kaohsiung Medical University, 100, Shih-Chun 1st Road, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
|November 13, 2010
Summary
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) shows better responsiveness than the Short Form 36 (SF-36) for evaluating outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Disease-specific measures are more informative than generic ones for treatment results.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Health Outcomes Research
- Quality of Life Measurement
Background:
- Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is increasingly important in healthcare evaluation.
- Physician use of HRQoL for comparing treatment responsiveness is limited.
- Clinical comparison of responsiveness between the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Short Form 36 (SF-36) after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the responsiveness of the HHS and SF-36.
- To determine the minimal important differences (MID) for both measures.
- To evaluate their utility in assessing outcomes after revision THA.
Main Methods:
- Revision THA patients completed HHS and SF-36 pre- and post-surgery (6 months).
- Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyzed score changes.
- Bootstrap estimation and modified Jacknife tests calculated confidence intervals for responsiveness.
Main Results:
- The HHS demonstrated superior responsiveness compared to the SF-36.
- Effect size (ES) and standardized response means (SRM) for pain and physical function were significantly higher for HHS (p < 0.001).
- Relative efficiency (RE) favored HHS, indicating greater sensitivity to change.
Conclusions:
- Disease-specific measures like HHS should be prioritized over generic measures (SF-36) for evaluating treatment outcomes.
- This finding supports the use of HHS for assessing patients undergoing revision THA.
- Clinicians and researchers should consider the specific nature of outcome measures in health status assessments.