Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models

Mechanistic models, a category encompassing both physiological and compartmental modeling, differ from empirical models' approaches to incorporating known factors about the systems being modeled. Empirical models describe data with minimal assumptions, while mechanistic models aim to provide a robust description of available data by specifying assumptions and integrating known factors about the system. Compartmental analysis is a key example of a mechanistic model in pharmacokinetics and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Integration of aggregate data in causally interpretable meta-analysis by inverse weighting.

Biometrics·2026

Same author

IV-learner: learning conditional average treatment effects using instrumental variables.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same author

Variable importance measures for heterogeneous treatment effects.

Biometrics·2025

Same author

Two stage least squares with time-varying instruments: An application to an evaluation of treatment intensification for type-2 diabetes.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025

Same author

Orthogonal prediction of counterfactual outcomes.

Journal of causal inference·2025

Same author

All Lines Is the Right Approach: Selecting Patient Lines of Therapy for an External Comparator Arm.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2025

Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026

Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026

Same journal

A robust neural network with random effects for subject-specific prediction of clustered count data.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026

Same journal

A comparison of methods for designing hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized trials with continuous effectiveness and implementation endpoints.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026

Same journal

Joint analysis of longitudinal and recurrent event data: A functional regression approach with autoregressive frailty.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026

Same journal

Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with verification biased data.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference.

Stijn Vansteelandt¹, Maarten Bekaert, Gerda Claeskens

¹Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Ghent University, 281 (S9) Krijgslaan, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. stijn.vansteelandt@ugent.be

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

|November 16, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Standard variable selection methods in observational studies can bias exposure effect estimates. A new procedure targets exposure effect quality, offering more reliable causal inference and robust confidence intervals even with ignored confounder selection.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Biostatistics
Causal Inference

Background:

Standard variable selection procedures are commonly used in observational studies for outcome prediction.
Their application to assess exposure effects can lead to biased estimators for both effects and their uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

To highlight the sub-optimal nature of standard variable selection in exposure effect assessment.
To propose a novel confounder-selection procedure that directly improves exposure effect estimation.
To identify causal inference strategies robust to confounder selection issues.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of standard variable selection versus a proposed targeted procedure.
Evaluation of causal inference strategies for their robustness and validity of confidence intervals.
Assessment of bias in exposure effect and uncertainty estimators.

Main Results:

Standard variable selection procedures are prone to introducing bias in observational studies.
The proposed procedure directly targets the quality of the exposure effect estimator.
Certain causal inference strategies provide valid confidence intervals and robustness against misspecification, even when confounder selection is ignored.

Conclusions:

Rethinking variable selection is crucial for accurate exposure effect estimation in observational research.
The proposed method offers a more direct approach to improving causal inference quality.
Specific causal inference techniques demonstrate resilience to confounder selection complexities.