Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Tubal Cytology of the Fallopian Tube as a Promising Tool for Ovarian Cancer Early Detection
Published on: July 25, 2017
MOLECULAR MARKERS OF EARLY CERVICAL NEOPLASIA
Alvaro P Pinto1, Christopher P Crum, Michelle S Hirsch
1Department of Pathology at the Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. Conflicts of interest: Alvaro Pinto received test reagents from Becton, Dickinson and Company to perform comparisons of ProEx C and other biomarkers.
Abstract:
Pure morphological distinction of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) from their mimics can be challenging. Diagnosis can be difficult with nonconventional HSILs associated with a metaplastic phenotype, squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) that defy precise classification such as "eosinophilic dysplasias", and those that overlap with columnar neoplasms, including stratified variants of adenocarcinoma in situ ("SMILE"). Gene expression and protein profiling have identified biomarkers with the potential to decrease diagnostic variability and increase specificity of histological and cytological analysis. Among the ones clinically useful for HSIL detection are p16(INK4A) and MIB-1 which complement each other, differentiating SIL from normal/atrophic (MIB-1 low) or reactive/immature metaplastic (p16(INK4A) scattered) epithelium. Additional markers, including ProEx(TM) C, have been proposed but their added value is yet to be established. In the final analysis, biomarkers are most helpful for distinguishing benign immature or atrophic proliferations from HSIL. The distinction of LSIL from HSIL must be made on the hematoxylin and eosin-stained section and should be made with care, given the potential consequences of a diagnosis of CIN2 or CIN3.

