Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026
07:01
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children
Published on: March 1, 2019
When is peer rejection justifiable?: Children's understanding across two cultures
Yoonjung Park1, Melanie Killen
1Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Cognitive Development
|November 16, 2010
Summary
Children find peer rejection based on group traits unfair, but friendship rejection more acceptable. Social reasoning about peer rejection is generally consistent across cultures, including Korean and U.S. youth.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Cross-Cultural Psychology
Background:
- Peer rejection is a significant aspect of social development.
- Understanding the reasoning behind peer rejection is crucial for social-cognitive development.
- Cultural variations in social reasoning require investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare how Korean and U.S. children and adolescents evaluate personality and group characteristics as reasons for peer rejection.
- To examine perceptions of fairness and legitimacy across different rejection contexts: friendship rejection, group exclusion, and victimization.
- To assess cultural generalizability of social reasoning in peer rejection.
Main Methods:
- Survey methodology involving Korean (N=397) and U.S. (N=333) participants aged 10 and 13.
- Evaluation of personality traits (aggression, shyness) and group characteristics (gender, nationality) as bases for rejection.
- Analysis of reasoning (personal choice) across three rejection contexts.
Main Results:
- Peer rejection based on group membership (gender, nationality) was perceived as less fair than rejection based on personality traits (aggression, shyness).
- Friendship rejection was deemed more legitimate than group exclusion or victimization.
- Children employed more personal choice reasoning for friendship rejection compared to other contexts.
- Few cultural differences emerged, supporting the generalizability of social reasoning.
Conclusions:
- Social reasoning regarding peer rejection shows considerable cultural consistency between Korean and U.S. youth.
- The perceived fairness and legitimacy of peer rejection vary by the basis (personality vs. group) and context (friendship, exclusion, victimization).
- Findings underscore the importance of social context and individual characteristics in children's judgments of peer rejection.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:20Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group effort.
03:00Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
01:30Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Social-emotional experiences and cultural influences play significant roles in shaping gender development. During middle childhood, from ages 6 to 11, peer groups become dominant in reinforcing gender norms. Children in this age group often align with same-gender peer groups, which actively encourage behaviors that conform to traditional gender roles. For instance, boys may be discouraged from engaging in activities perceived as feminine, reinforcing culturally dictated norms about masculinity...
01:23Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Adolescence is a pivotal period of identity formation, during which individuals begin to answer questions central to their sense of self, such as "Who am I?" and "Who do I hope to become?" Both parents and peers play critical roles in guiding adolescents through this complex developmental phase.
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
01:26Self-Esteem and Culture
Self-esteem, a core psychological construct, is intricately shaped by cultural context and varies significantly between collectivist and individualistic societies. In collectivist cultures such as Japan, self-esteem tends to be flexible, context-sensitive, and influenced by relationships. A Japanese student, for instance, may show restraint in formal settings like school but behave more openly among close friends, reflecting the flexible and dynamic nature of self-concept in such...
01:24Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are themselves.