Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Conduct Disorder

Conduct Disorder

Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...

Oppositional Defiant Disorder

Oppositional Defiant Disorder

A persistent pattern of angry or irritable mood, defiant behavior, or vindictiveness characterizes Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). Symptoms must occur over at least six months, involve interactions with individuals beyond siblings, and meet specific diagnostic criteria to be clinically significant. The disorder affects emotional regulation, social interactions, and behavior, often manifesting early in life and influencing long-term development and functioning.
Diagnostic Criteria and...

Torts II

Torts II

Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.

Torts III

Torts III

Types of Quasi-intentional Torts in Healthcare
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.

Torts I

Torts I

Torts in nursing are wrongful acts that can harm patients and potentially lead to civil liability for the involved nurse. These wrongful acts range from unintentional errors to deliberate actions. Depending on the nature and severity of the tort, a nurse found liable may face financial penalties or disciplinary actions. Understanding the distinctions between intentional, quasi-intentional, and unintentional torts is crucial for nurses to mitigate risks and provide safe patient care.
Intentional...

Antisocial Personality Disorder

Antisocial Personality Disorder

Antisocial personality disorder is a chronic mental health condition characterized by persistent patterns of disregard for the rights and well-being of others. Individuals with antisocial personality disorder exhibit behaviors that include deceitfulness, impulsivity, irresponsibility, aggression, and a profound lack of empathy. These traits often manifest early in life and persist into adulthood, leading to significant personal, social, and legal consequences.
Behavioral Characteristics and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Psychiatric Risk Governance Across Jurisdictions: A Comparative Analysis of Involuntary Treatment, Community Treatment Orders, and Forensic Mental Health Services.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Same author

Interventions for the unhoused individual with schizophrenia: a civilized plan.

CNS spectrums·2025

Same author

The forensic assessment of dissociation: Distinguishing real from the unreal.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2023

Same author

Role of Mandated Community Treatment for Justice-Involved Individuals With Serious Mental Illness.

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2020

Same author

Jail diversion: a practical primer.

CNS spectrums·2020

Same author

Violence and Suicide Risk Assessment in Youth with Psychotic Disorders: Practical Considerations for Community Clinicians.

Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

A Novel Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Juvenile Rats

A Novel Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Juvenile Rats

Published on: December 8, 2014

Juveniles in court.

Matthew F Soulier¹, Charles L Scott

¹Division of Psychiatry and Law, University of California, Davis Campus, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. msoulier@yahoo.com

Harvard Review of Psychiatry

|November 18, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Child psychiatrists emerged from early juvenile courts aiming to reform young offenders. Their role evolved with the justice system, now addressing complex issues like juvenile competency and transfer to adult courts.

More Related Videos

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

A Novel Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Juvenile Rats

A Novel Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Juvenile Rats

Published on: December 8, 2014

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Area of Science:

Forensic Psychiatry
Developmental Psychology
Legal Medicine

Background:

19th-century American reformers established juvenile courts to address juvenile delinquency, focusing on rehabilitation.
The field of child psychiatry originated from efforts to treat delinquent youths within this system.

Observation:

Juvenile courts initially aimed for a parental role in rehabilitation, but this was not fully achieved.
Legal changes (1966-1975) and rising delinquency in the 1980s shifted focus towards retribution.

Findings:

Child psychiatrists' roles expanded beyond rehabilitation as juvenile courts increasingly mirrored adult criminal courts.
Modern juvenile courts consult child psychiatrists on issues like capital punishment, transfer, and competency due to developmental expertise.

Implications:

Child psychiatrists play a crucial role in the contemporary juvenile justice system, offering expertise on adolescent development.
Understanding the historical evolution of juvenile justice is key to appreciating the current involvement of forensic child psychiatrists.