[Urologic surgical procedures in patients with uterus neoplasm and colon-rectal cancer]

INTRODUCTION. During the last 30 years, the multidisciplinary treatments of colon and uterus neoplasm have yielded an increase in total survival rates, fostering therefore the increase of cases with regional relapse involving the urinary tract. In these cases the iterative surgery can be performed, if no disease secondary to pelvic pain, haemostatic or debulking procedure is present, and must be considered and discussed with the patient, according to his/her general status. MATERIALS AND METHODS. From 1997 to August 2007 we performed altogether 43 pelvic iterative surgeries, with simultaneous urologic surgical procedure because of pelvic tumor relapse in patients with uterus neoplasm and colon and rectal cancer. In 4 cases of anal cancer, the urological procedure were: one radical prostatectomy with continent vesicostomy in the first case, while in the other 3 cases radical pelvectomy with double-barrelled uretero-cutaneostomy. In 23 cases of colon cancer, the urologic procedures were: 9 cases of radical cystectomy with double-barrelled uretero-cutaneostomy, 4 cases of radical cystectomy with uretero-ileo-cutaneostomy according to Bricker- Wallace II procedure, and 9 cases of partial cystectomy with pelvic ureterectomy and ureterocystoneostomy according to Lich-Gregoire technique (7 cases) and Lembo-Boari (2 cases) procedure. In 16 cases of uterus cancer, the urological procedure were: 7 cases of partial cystectomy with pelvic ureterectomy and uretero-cystoneostomy according to Lich-Gregoire procedure; in 3 cases, a radical cystectomy with urinary continent cutaneous diversion according to the Ileal T-pouch procedure; 2 cases of total pelvectomy and double uretero-cutaneostomy, and 4 cases of bilateral uretero-cutaneostomy. RESULTS. No patients died in the perioperative time; early systemic complications were: 2 esophageal candidiasis, 1 case of venous thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS. The iterative pelvic surgery in the case of oncological relapse involving the urinary tract aims to achieve the best quality of life with the utmost oncological radicality. The equation: eradication of pelvic neoplasm and urinary tract reconstruction, with acceptable quality of life, will be the future target; nevertheless, it is not possible to establish guidelines beforehand, and the therapy must be adapted to each single case.