Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

A Retrograde Implantation Approach for Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement in Mice
Published on: July 20, 2022
In-center hemodialysis six times per week versus three times per week
Insights
Increasing hemodialysis frequency improved cardiac health and physical well-being in patients, though it led to more vascular access interventions. This study highlights benefits of frequent hemodialysis for kidney disease patients.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Maintenance hemodialysis patients often experience adverse cardiac and physical health outcomes.
- Optimizing hemodialysis frequency is crucial for improving patient well-being and intermediate outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of increasing hemodialysis frequency on left ventricular mass and self-reported physical health.
- To assess other intermediate outcomes, including cognitive function, depression, and laboratory markers, in patients undergoing frequent hemodialysis.
Main Methods:
- A randomized clinical trial comparing frequent hemodialysis (6 times/week) with conventional hemodialysis (3 times/week) for 12 months.
- Coprimary outcomes included death or change in left ventricular mass (cardiac MRI) and death or change in physical health composite score (RAND 36-item survey).
- Secondary outcomes encompassed cognitive performance, depression, nutritional markers, blood pressure, and hospitalization rates.
Main Results:
- Frequent hemodialysis significantly reduced the risk of death or increase in left ventricular mass and death or decrease in physical health composite score.
- Patients on frequent hemodialysis showed improved hypertension and hyperphosphatemia control.
- Increased vascular access interventions were noted in the frequent hemodialysis group, with no significant impact on cognitive function or depression.
Conclusions:
- Frequent hemodialysis offers significant benefits for left ventricular mass and physical health composite outcomes compared to conventional hemodialysis.
- While effective, frequent hemodialysis necessitates careful monitoring due to increased vascular access intervention rates.
- The findings support exploring frequent hemodialysis as a strategy to improve overall health in maintenance hemodialysis patients.
Background:
In this randomized clinical trial, we aimed to determine whether increasing the frequency of in-center hemodialysis would result in beneficial changes in left ventricular mass, self-reported physical health, and other intermediate outcomes among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
Methods:
Patients were randomly assigned to undergo hemodialysis six times per week (frequent hemodialysis, 125 patients) or three times per week (conventional hemodialysis, 120 patients) for 12 months. The two coprimary composite outcomes were death or change (from baseline to 12 months) in left ventricular mass, as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and death or change in the physical-health composite score of the RAND 36-item health survey. Secondary outcomes included cognitive performance; self-reported depression; laboratory markers of nutrition, mineral metabolism, and anemia; blood pressure; and rates of hospitalization and of interventions related to vascular access.
Results:
Patients in the frequent-hemodialysis group averaged 5.2 sessions per week; the weekly standard Kt/V(urea) (the product of the urea clearance and the duration of the dialysis session normalized to the volume of distribution of urea) was significantly higher in the frequent-hemodialysis group than in the conventional-hemodialysis group (3.54±0.56 vs. 2.49±0.27). Frequent hemodialysis was associated with significant benefits with respect to both coprimary composite outcomes (hazard ratio for death or increase in left ventricular mass, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.82; hazard ratio for death or a decrease in the physical-health composite score, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.92). Patients randomly assigned to frequent hemodialysis were more likely to undergo interventions related to vascular access than were patients assigned to conventional hemodialysis (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.08 to 2.73). Frequent hemodialysis was associated with improved control of hypertension and hyperphosphatemia. There were no significant effects of frequent hemodialysis on cognitive performance, self-reported depression, serum albumin concentration, or use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.
Conclusions:
Frequent hemodialysis, as compared with conventional hemodialysis, was associated with favorable results with respect to the composite outcomes of death or change in left ventricular mass and death or change in a physical-health composite score but prompted more frequent interventions related to vascular access. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00264758.).
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy