Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks
Published on: May 13, 2016
Genetic divergence in morphology-performance mapping between Misty Lake and inlet stickleback.
A P Hendry1, K Hudson, J A Walker
1Redpath Museum, McGill University, 859 Sherbrooke St. West, Montréal, QC, Canada. andrew.hendry@mcgill.ca
Lake stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) exhibited superior sustained and burst swimming performance, alongside distinct morphology, compared to inlet populations. These findings suggest adaptive divergence in morphology-performance relationships between environments.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Ecology
- Animal behavior
Background:
- Environmental pressures drive organismal adaptation, leading to divergence in performance and morphology.
- Understanding the genetic basis of morphology-performance relationships is crucial for evolutionary studies.
- Few studies have experimentally tested these hypotheses across different populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate adaptive genetic divergence in morphology and swimming performance between lake and inlet stickleback populations.
- To examine the relationships between morphology and performance within and between populations.
- To test the hypothesis that different environments select for distinct morphology-performance associations.
Main Methods:
- A common-garden experiment was conducted using threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from the Misty system.
- Morphological traits and multiple aspects of swimming performance (sustained, burst, maneuverability) were quantified.
- Analyses controlled for body size and environmental differences.
Main Results:
- Lake stickleback possessed shallower bodies, larger caudal fins, and smaller pelvic girdles compared to inlet populations, controlling for body size.
- Lake stickleback demonstrated superior sustained and burst swimming performance.
- Inlet stickleback showed greater maneuverability in certain analyses, and morphology-performance relationships differed between populations.
Conclusions:
- Populations adapting to different environments exhibit adaptive genetic divergence in morphology and swimming performance.
- Morphology-performance mapping is decoupled within versus between populations, indicating distinct evolutionary trajectories.
- Environmental adaptation leads to divergent genetic underpinnings of performance traits and their associated morphology.
Related Concept Videos
Speciation Rates
Genetics of Speciation
Gene Flow
Hybrid Zones
Fixed Action Patterns
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

