Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026
Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
Effectiveness of different irrigant agitation techniques on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a
Tina Rödig1, Stefan Döllmann, Frank Konietschke
1Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. troedig@med.uni-goettingen.de
Introduction:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the cleaning efficacy of different irrigant agitation techniques on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals.
Methods:
Mesiobuccal root canals of 108 mandibular molars were shaped with nickel-titanium instruments, and a final rinse of NaOCl and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was performed. Specimens were assigned to 4 groups (n = 20) and submitted to the following irrigation agitation techniques: no agitation (control), ultrasonic, EndoActivator, and CanalBrush. Root canals were split longitudinally and subjected to scanning electron microscopy. The presence of debris and smear layer at coronal and apical levels was evaluated by using a 5-grade scoring system with 200× and 1000× magnification, respectively.
Results:
Concerning debris removal, no significant differences among groups were detected. In the coronal region, agitation of the irrigants resulted in significantly more smear layer removal than the control. EndoActivator was significantly more effective than ultrasonic agitation and CanalBrush.
Conclusions:
In curved root canals, activation of NaOCl and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid did not enhance debris removal but resulted in significantly more effective smear layer removal at coronal levels.
