Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The grand rapids dip could it be real?

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

Exploring the heterogeneity in impacts of 30 km/h speed interventions: A subgroup meta-analysis based on a systematic international review.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

The flattening of road accident risk: How best to describe it?

Journal of safety research·2025
Same author

The protective effect of pedestrian reflective devices: A combined micro- and macro-level study.

Journal of safety research·2025
Same author

Evaluating the safety and speed impacts of the 20mph speed limit in the UK: Evidence and insights.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2025
Same author

Changes in road safety following regional administrative reforms in Norway.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2025
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Assessing causality in multivariate accident models.

Rune Elvik1

  • 1Institute of Transport Economics, Gaustadalléen 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway. re@toi.no

Accident; Analysis and Prevention
|November 25, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study applies nine criteria of causality to statistical models for accident prediction. Controlling for confounding factors is key to determining if safety treatment effects are causal or mere associations.

Area of Science:

  • Traffic Safety
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Causality Assessment

Background:

  • Accident prediction models often use statistical associations to represent safety treatment effects.
  • Distinguishing causal relationships from non-causal associations is crucial for effective safety interventions.
  • Existing causality criteria from epidemiology offer a framework for this assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply operational criteria of causality to multivariate statistical models for accident counts.
  • To evaluate the extent to which model coefficients represent causal effects of safety treatments.
  • To provide a systematic approach for assessing causality in accident prediction models.

Main Methods:

  • Development and application of nine criteria of causality.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

  • Analysis of multivariate statistical models for accident prediction.
  • Focus on controlling for confounding factors within the models.
  • Main Results:

    • The nine criteria provide a framework for assessing causality in accident prediction models.
    • Effective control of confounding factors is the most critical criterion for establishing causality.
    • Some model relationships may be reasonably interpreted as causal, while others are less supported.

    Conclusions:

    • Operational criteria of causality can be applied to statistical accident prediction models.
    • Causality assessment in these models is indicative, not definitive proof.
    • Careful consideration of confounding factors is essential for valid causal inference in traffic safety research.