Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Algebraic Connectivity Reveals Modulated High-Order Functional Networks in Alzheimer's Disease.

ArXiv·2026
Same author

Artificial Intelligence and Wearable Technologies for Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026
Same author

Microscopic Propagator Imaging with diffusion MRI.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2025
Same author

Wearable EEG-IMU based Framework for Investigating Neural Correlates of Motor-Cognitive Interaction in Multiple Sclerosis.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Brain Connectivity Gradients Alterations in Discordant Cerebrospinal Fluid Profile for Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers.

Human brain mapping·2025
Same author

Toward in-silico data assessment for passive BCIs: generating EEG rhythms with GANs.

Journal of neural engineering·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
10:25

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping

Published on: September 25, 2019

Validation through accuracy prediction in neuroimage registration.

Francesca Pizzorni Ferrarese1, Flavio Simonetti, Roberto Foroni

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of Verona, Italy. francesca.pizzorniferrarese@univr.it

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference
|November 25, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel Petri Net approach to predict medical image processing accuracy before clinical application. This method identifies inaccuracy sources for improved algorithm performance and workflow optimization.

More Related Videos

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
10:25

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping

Published on: September 25, 2019

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Medical image processing
  • Computational modeling
  • Algorithm validation

Background:

  • Clinical adoption of medical image processing algorithms is hindered by validation and accuracy assessment challenges.
  • Current methods rely on a-posteriori analysis, lacking a-priori performance estimation.
  • This limits the ability to optimize processing workflows proactively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel approach using Petri Nets for predicting the accuracy of medical image processing algorithms.
  • To address the limitations of classical a-posteriori validation by enabling a-priori performance estimation.
  • To demonstrate the proof of concept in the specific domain of medical image registration.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a Petri Net model to represent and characterize sources of inaccuracy in image processing pipelines.
  • Evaluation of the impact of identified inaccuracy sources on the estimation of deformation fields in image registration.
  • Validation using synthetic datasets and real clinical cases, comparing predicted inaccuracy with posterior measurements.

Main Results:

  • The proposed Petri Net model demonstrated good prediction performance for accuracy in image registration.
  • The approach successfully identified and characterized sources of inaccuracy along the processing chain.
  • Initial validation on synthetic and real data supports the model's predictive capabilities.

Conclusions:

  • Petri Nets offer a viable method for a-priori accuracy prediction in medical image processing.
  • This approach can guide the optimization of processing workflows and algorithm selection.
  • Further characterization with extensive clinical data is recommended for comprehensive system validation.