Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026
Determination of Cardiac Output in a Porcine Model for Ex Vivo Pulmonary Perfusion
Published on: June 28, 2024
Comparison between pulse waveform analysis and thermodilution cardiac output determination in patients with severe
R A Dyer1, J L Piercy, A R Reed
1D23 Department of Anaesthesia, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, 7925 Cape Town, South Africa. robert.dyer@uct.ac.za
Background:
This study compared cardiac output (CO) measurements derived from pulse waveform analysis with values obtained by thermodilution (TD), in patients with post-partum complications of severe pre-eclampsia.
Methods:
Eighteen patients were recruited, 24-96 h post-delivery. After central venous calibration of the pulse waveform analysis monitor (LiDCOplus), CO readings were compared with those obtained by the TD method and repeated twice at 15 min intervals. The comparison was repeated after peripheral venous calibration. Further comparisons were made in eight patients at 120 and 240 min after peripheral venous calibration.
Results:
Data were pooled for measurements at 0, 15, and 30 min after calibration. For the comparison between TD and LiDCOplus using central venous calibration, TD exhibited a significant positive bias of 0.58 litre min⁻¹ [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77 to 0.39]. After peripheral venous calibration, there was no significant bias [0.16 litre min⁻¹ (95% CI: -0.37 to 0.06)]. The estimated limits of agreement for central and peripheral venous calibrations were -2.12 to 0.96 and -1.50 to 1.20 litre min⁻¹, respectively. When comparing LiDCOplus and TD, there was no time-based effect at 120 or 240 min post-peripheral calibration.
Conclusions:
Central and peripheral venous calibrations of the LiDCOplus monitor were associated with clinically insignificant bias when compared with TD. Limits of agreement were within the recommendation of 30% for acceptance of a new CO technique when compared with current reference methods. This form of minimally invasive CO monitoring may have a valuable role in obstetric critical care.
Related Concept Videos
01:17Measurement of Blood Pressure
01:05Pulse
Pulse Rate and its Significance
Pulse rate, often measured in beats per minute (bpm), reflects the heart rate (HR), which is influenced by numerous factors such as stress, physical activity, and hormonal changes. A normal resting adult pulse rate falls between...
01:16Pulse
The pulse serves as a clinical indicator...
01:19Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
01:30Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
01:28Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.